Design Article
Comment
AndyBeak
Having used data from several analyst firms, I can say that the important issue ...
mranderson
Strategy Analytics screwed up in the analysis. Perhaps they will do better in ...
Analysts clash over Marvell's apps processor sales
Junko Yoshida
10/15/2012 1:03 PM EDT
TOKYO -- As global demand for smartphones soars, a cottage industry is growing up around ranking the stiff competition in the strategic application processor market.
Days after market watcher Strategy Analytics released a report on “Smartphone Apps Processor Growth” for the first half of 2012, another researcher, Forward Concepts (Tempe, Ariz.), countered that the ranking by the rival research firm had “totally missed" Marvell Semiconductor, the Silicon Valley chip maker that is widely seen as among the leaders in the apps processor market.
[Get a 10% discount on ARM TechCon 2012 conference passes by using promo code EDIT. Click here to learn about the show and register.]
Both market researchers agree that Qualcomm is the No. 1 smartphone applications processor vendor as measured by both unit sales and revenue during the first half of 2012. Samsung, MediaTek, Broadcom and Texas Instruments rounded out Strategy Analytics' top five rankings for the first six months of this year.
Will Strauss, president of Forward Concepts begs to differ. While agreeing that Qualcomm leads the market, Strauss said the failure to include Marvell in the top five is a serious omission.
“Marvell is a major supplier of application processors [and baseband], not only for Research in Motion (RIM) but also for China TD-SCDMA cellphones from companies like Asus, Huawei, Lenovo, Sony, TCL-Alcatel, Tianyu and ZTE," Strauss noted. "Marvell, in the first half of 2012, had a greater unit market share than MediaTek” of Taiwan.
Strauss estimates that Marvell shipped 23.2 million application processors in the first half of 2012, more than TI (18.4 million units) and Broadcom (12.6 million units).
While the dueling market watchers are essentially quibbling over two spots in their industry rankings, the dispute underscores the growing importance of market share in strategic segments like smartphone chips.
Strategy Analytics fired back at Strauss on Monday (Oct. 15). In a blog post, the firm defended its ranking methodology, saying it placed Marvell sixth in smartphone applications processor sales in the first half of year. According to Strategy Analytics, Marvell's strong performance in TD-SCDMA smartphone apps processor shipments to China Mobile were not enough to offset declining shipments at RIM, a big Marvell customer. Marvell dropped out of Strategy Analytics' top five in applications processors after shipments declined 26 percent during the first half of the year compared to the first half of 2011.
Forward Concepts also includes Apple in its apps processor rankings, resulting in the following vendor ranking for smartphone apps processors: Qualcomm, Apple, Samsung, Marvell and TI.
Smartphone Application Processor Shipments (millions of units), 1H 2012

(Source: Forward Concepts)
(Source: Forward Concepts)
Next: MediaTek emerging
Navigate to related information


junko.yoshida
10/15/2012 7:05 PM EDT
I think whether Marvell slipped from the top five smartphone apps processor ranking during the first half of 2012 is of great interest to many in the electronics industry. But even more revealing to me is the table (and pie chart) in the page 2 of this story, showing the smartphone baseband chip ranking. The table and the pie chart here include both baseband/apps combo chips and standalone baseband processors for smartphones. A key takeawa here is that more and more smartphones adopt baseband/apps processor combo solutions, those without basband will continue to fade in the smartphone chip maret.
Sign in to Reply
mranderson
10/15/2012 8:52 PM EDT
Strategy Analytics screwed up in the analysis. Perhaps they will do better in the future. This market segment is an interesting one given the recent shift toward smartphones and tablets and away from laptop and desktop computers. I think the market for tablets and laptops is effectively one segment. Microsoft's new version of windows appears to be targeted specifically for it and may be the most innovative piece of software from Microsoft since Windows 95. Linux and its derivatives has control for the moment since Google came out with Android.
Sign in to Reply
AndyBeak
10/17/2012 3:33 AM EDT
Having used data from several analyst firms, I can say that the important issue is the knowledge, experience and credibility of the analyst themselves. I have never heard of this Forward Concepts guy. I'm not suggesting he is simply an internet troll, but if I had to trust only one view, I think I would go with an agency that has been around since the 70s and is widely recognized as a leader in the space.
Sign in to Reply