datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

Design Article

Analysis gives first look inside Apple's A4 processor

Young Choi, UBM TechInsights

5/10/2010 8:00 PM EDT

Finding Apple's A4 foundry
Our silicon analysis on the applications processors revealed that Apple applies new technology to the iPod Touch family (which doesn’t have cellular wireless function) before they apply the same technology to the iPhone family. Applications processors for the iPhone and the iPhone 3G both used the 90nm embedded DRAM process from Samsung.

When Apple switched to 65nm process technology for their own applications processor, they used this same technology for the iPod Touch second generation and then applied it to the iPhone 3GS. The same trend was seen in the iPod Touch third generation and the iPad. Among Apple systems, the iPod Touch third generation, not the iPad, was first to adopt a 45nm applications processor.

Having seen every product Apple has introduced in the mobile market, we were able to quickly discover the process node and foundry of the A4 processor based on the intelligence gathered from previous applications processors. A free report on this evolution is available online.

While process node identification is a rather simple task, identifying foundry or manufacturer of a semiconductor product is often very challenging. Continued coverage of major foundries for multiple process node generations becomes a key to success. We compared features of the A4 such as die edge seals, passivation, and dielectrics against known signatures from a broad range of manufacturers.

We have seen consistent matching between the two 45nm processors from the third generation iPod Touch and the iPad, allowing us to confidently identify Samsung as the foundry of the A4 processor.

Establishing the foundry and process node is an important first step. It allows us to bring knowledge about process characteristics and standard cell libraries to bear when determining how innovative design may have contributed to performance and power consumption.





craigth

5/7/2010 6:24 PM EDT

What would really be a great compliment to this analysis articel is to investigate and report what EDA design tools were used to design the chips.

Sign in to Reply



SL325

5/8/2010 1:25 AM EDT

I think they are 3D multi chip modules so that is probably the size of the DRAM integrated into the package

Sign in to Reply



CharlieCL

5/8/2010 8:51 AM EDT

Looks no performance advance in A4. What is the magic of 10 hours running time?

Sign in to Reply



rick.merritt

5/8/2010 12:19 PM EDT

What's I'd love to see is more comparisons between the capabilities of the A4 and other similar generation ARM mobile processors like the Qualcomm Snapdragon, Nvidia Tegra 1/2 and TI OMAP 3/4.

Sign in to Reply



luting

5/10/2010 11:18 AM EDT

Is this really Apple own design or Samsung chip with Apple logo on it?

Sign in to Reply



EET Administrator

5/11/2010 7:33 PM EDT

test

Sign in to Reply



sglass68

6/1/2010 6:05 AM EDT

Hi,

I think your Dhrystone numbers are out by a factor of 1000. ARM's Cortex-A8 is 2 DMIPS / MHz, not 2000.

Regards,
Simon

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)