Design Article
Powering LED luminaires: What’s the best option?
Arnoldas Bagdonas, Future Electronics
11/29/2012 10:15 AM EST
Introduction
Compromises and workarounds undertaken in an effort to meet the requirements of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) have had the potential in the past to markedly impair the reliability and efficiency, and increase the total production cost, of the power circuit in an LED luminaire.
A typical example of a power circuit for an LED luminaire using conventional power components is shown in figure 1. Excessive radiated emissions will normally lead the design team to shield the entire housing. In practice, however, this increases the parasitic capacity between the (now larger) conductive area – that is, the chassis plus its shield – and the reference ground of any EMC measurement equipment. Common-mode conducted interference then becomes a large enough phenomenon to require attention. While a low-cost EMI filter will eliminate this problem, this author has seen designs in which even these counter-measures are not sufficient, since higher-frequency emissions radiated by the mains cable persist, and must be blocked by a more expensive filter with higher attenuation.
The root cause of the problem in LED luminaires is the power supply’s high-speed switching circuits, which create wide spectrum current and/or voltage ripples. Shielding and filtering might mitigate the emission problem, but do not eradicate it. A better solution would be to avoid generating high emissions at particular frequencies in the first place – and this is now possible through the use of new power components that use soft switching to minimize ripple currents, or to spread the noise energy over a wide frequency band.
Figure 2 shows that there are broadly five architectures used today, each suited to different power outputs. Each of these LED driver topologies enables the designer to comply with the strict requirements of today’s EMC regulations. While figure 2 indicates the power range in which each topology is most commonly used, it should be noted that each can be adapted for use in a higher or lower power output range.
Next: Page 2
Compromises and workarounds undertaken in an effort to meet the requirements of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) have had the potential in the past to markedly impair the reliability and efficiency, and increase the total production cost, of the power circuit in an LED luminaire.
A typical example of a power circuit for an LED luminaire using conventional power components is shown in figure 1. Excessive radiated emissions will normally lead the design team to shield the entire housing. In practice, however, this increases the parasitic capacity between the (now larger) conductive area – that is, the chassis plus its shield – and the reference ground of any EMC measurement equipment. Common-mode conducted interference then becomes a large enough phenomenon to require attention. While a low-cost EMI filter will eliminate this problem, this author has seen designs in which even these counter-measures are not sufficient, since higher-frequency emissions radiated by the mains cable persist, and must be blocked by a more expensive filter with higher attenuation.
The root cause of the problem in LED luminaires is the power supply’s high-speed switching circuits, which create wide spectrum current and/or voltage ripples. Shielding and filtering might mitigate the emission problem, but do not eradicate it. A better solution would be to avoid generating high emissions at particular frequencies in the first place – and this is now possible through the use of new power components that use soft switching to minimize ripple currents, or to spread the noise energy over a wide frequency band.
Figure 1: a typical AC/DC LED driver design. The H-field is the result of winding leakage, the primary loop area and the secondary loop area. The E-field is the result of high dV/dt on conductive surfaces and of high-frequency ripple in cables.
Click on image to enlarge
Click on image to enlarge
Figure 2 shows that there are broadly five architectures used today, each suited to different power outputs. Each of these LED driver topologies enables the designer to comply with the strict requirements of today’s EMC regulations. While figure 2 indicates the power range in which each topology is most commonly used, it should be noted that each can be adapted for use in a higher or lower power output range.
Next: Page 2
Navigate to related information




docdivakar
12/13/2012 2:33 PM EST
"parasitic capacity" needs to be stated as "parasitic capacitance!" Big difference between the two!!
MP Divakar
Sign in to Reply
Arnoldas Bagdonas
1/11/2013 10:21 AM EST
I don't know how it had happen and why I mixed these expressions.
Thank you for your remark!
BR
Arnoldas
Sign in to Reply
anne-francoise.pele
4/12/2013 8:56 AM EDT
Click on the link below to check out the collection of Design Articles, Case Studies, Product How-To articles, Teardowns, etc... that have been published on Smart Energy Designline.
Check back frequently. The list will be updated as new articles arrive.
http://www.eetimes.com/design/smart-energy-design/4371743/LED-Focus
Sign in to Reply