datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

Design Article

Grumman Lunar Module slideshow

Steve Taranovich

6/21/2012 2:32 PM EDT

July 20, 1969 was a historic day for America and the world. While the world watched on TV, astronaut Neil Armstrong took mankind’s first steps on the moon.

At its Bethpage, N.Y. facility, Grumman Corporation, now part of the Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems sector, designed, assembled, integrated and tested the Lunar Module (better known as the LM), the famed Eagle of the Apollo program. Between 1969 and 1972, six Grumman lunar modules carried 12 astronauts to and from the surface of the moon and one – Aquarius – served as a lifeboat for three astronauts during the ill-fated Apollo 13 mission.

Of course, there were a great many other companies that were an integral part of the LM’s success, but for this article, we concentrate on the Long Island, NY company that was so instrumental in aviation and the Apollo program. TRW also provided critical software for mission analysis and simulation, guidance and trajectory control, an abort guidance control, and a backup communications system.

As NASA’s official history of the Apollo hardware puts it, the LEMDE (Lunar Module Descent Engine) “probably was the biggest challenge and the most outstanding technical development” of the entire program.

Two other companies that are now part of the Electronic Systems sector also made significant contributions to the mission. Dalmo-Victor designed and supplied the S-band 2-Gigahertz high-gain antennas that made possible the transmission of the live images from the moon's surface. Amecom Division of Litton Systems, Inc. produced flush-mounted antennas that transmitted and received all S-band signals during near-Earth operation and served as backup for the high-gain antenna in deep space. Four antennas were mounted on the command module.

Legacy Northrop provided the earth landing system that included the space vehicle recovery parachutes for Apollo 11.

Key systems on the LM were:

Electrical power system (EPS)
: The EPS contained fuel cells and batteries and provided both direct and alternating current electricity. Most of the EPS's systems were in the Service Module (SM), but the Command Module (CM) carried three batteries.

Guidance, navigation and control system (GNCS): This system measured and controlled the spacecraft's position, attitude and velocity. It  included inertial, optical and computer subsystems. The inertial subsystem used accelerometers to measure the spacecraft's speed and rotation along its three axes. The optical system included a telescope, a sextant and an electronic system that sent optical data to the spacecraft's computer for navigation purposes. The computer system analyzed data from the other subsystems as well as from manual commands from astronauts.

The computer would send the commands to the spacecraft's propulsion system to make course adjustments. The computer also had a digital autopilot that could control the spacecraft during all phases of the mission.

Stabilization and control system (SCS): This system included controls and displays for the crew of the Apollo to adjust the spacecraft's rotation or velocity manually. The system sent commands to the spacecraft's propulsion system.

Service propulsion system: Located in the SM, this propulsion system included four tanks of hydrazine fuel and nitrogen tetroxide oxidizer. These substances are hypergolic, which means they ignite spontaneously when mixed together. The system used helium tanks to pressurize the fuel lines. The system's rocket engine produced up to 20,500 pounds (91,225 Newtons) of thrust. NASA mounted the engine on a gimbal, which is a support that can pivot. By pivoting the engine in the right direction, the spacecraft could maneuver to the right attitude and trajectory.

Reaction control systems (RCS): The RCS was a system of engines and fuel tanks. It was partly used as a redundant system, meaning it could control the spacecraft's movement if the main propulsion system went offline. Both the CM and SM had an independent RCS. The SM had four quads, which were groups of four rocket engines. Each engine could supply 100 pounds (445 newtons) of thrust. The CM had two six-engine groups, with each engine capable of supplying 93 pounds (413.9 newtons) of thrust. The CM's RCS also provided spacecraft control during re-entry.

Telecommunication system: This system provided intercommunication between the astronauts in space and staff back on Earth as well as between the astronauts themselves. It included S-band and very high frequency (VHF) radio transmitters and receivers and a transponder. Astronauts used the VHF equipment for short-range communication and the S-band equipment to communicate across deep space. Whenever a large body – for example, the moon – was between the spacecraft and the flight crew on the ground, communication was lost.

Environmental control system (ECS): This system controlled the spacecraft's atmospheric pressure and temperature and also managed water. It collected water from the ship's fuel cells (a useful byproduct). The ECS adjusted the temperature in the CSM through a water and glycol cooling system. The system pumped the water and glycol through coolant loops to reduce the temperature of the liquid. Then the system pumped the liquid through tubes to cool the CSM's atmosphere and electric systems, much like a liquid-cooled computer's cooling system.

Earth landing system: Housed in the CM, this system consisted of several mortar-deployed parachutes. NASA designed the Apollo spacecraft with the intention of a water landing upon re-entry. The parachutes slowed the spacecraft's descent enough to ensure the safety of the crew inside the spacecraft.

The list above just scratches the surface of the CSM's systems and controls, and doesn’t even show the lunar module systems. (Thanks to “How Stuff Works” website, a Discovery company)

Check out a slideshow of photos of the Grumman Lunar Modules on the following pages:


Because the Moon moves around the Earth at more than 2,000 mph, the Lunar landing has to be calculated to coincide with the Moon's position at the end of the three-day journey to get there.





Brett_cgb

6/21/2012 9:19 PM EDT

Small pictures of photographs, one per page.

Can we do a little better?

Sign in to Reply



patrick.mannion

6/22/2012 6:49 PM EDT

Hey Brett_cgb, we hear ya, and agree: It was a bit of a stretch. We did another, this time on Jim Williams and Bob Pease (RIP) and we think you'll prefer this format: http://www.edn.com/design/analog/4375963/Slideshow--Remembering-Jim-Williams-and-Bob-Pease

As for the quality of the photos, well, Steve (and his wife) took in a casual tour of the museum, really got into it, and only later realized that the photos had a story to tell, which they do. A remarkable story indeed, and always fun and engaging to hear about. Best regards,

Sign in to Reply



RManley

6/22/2012 7:39 AM EDT

Thanks for taking me back to when the space program was on everyones minds and hearts. I live near the Cape here in Melbourne, FL and find that this area still thrives on "space nuts" like me. I don't like missing launches, even though the shuttle is retired now, we still shoot off a lot of "one stick" rockets. One minor correction I would make is that I believe the Lunar Module as you called it (LM) was actually called the LEM for Lunar Excursion Module... I

Sign in to Reply



IllinoisPE

6/22/2012 11:31 PM EDT

What I remember of July 20, 1969. I was working for Northrop, Defense Systems Division and on my way home from Fort Monmouth in New Jersey. I was asked to divert to Grumman Bethpage, NY and help with an AN/ALQ-80 ECM pod / Grumman OV-1 Mowhawk interface problem. By the time I made it to Grumman and resolved the problem it was after 11:00 pm. The Grumman Engineers told me that a LM (sister to the one on the moon) was set up in the next hanger and asked if I wanted to see it.

Grumman had imported truck loads of shale to coat the floor in front of the LEM and had a black tarp set up behind it. There were TV cameras set up to look over a table loaded with the shale. On the monitor it appeared that the camera was looking over the edge of a creator at the LEM. The TV views from the hanger were labeled as such.

I took a small rock from the table and headed back to Illinois. The next morning all the early news was about the moon landing and there were shots from the Grumman hanger. I produced the rock and told me family it was from right there, pointing to the spot on TV. My oldest did not buy it as a moon rock. I had to show him that the TV stated it was was not a moon shot and point out that I never said it was a moon rock to gain back any credibility. I have no idea what happened to the rock!

Sign in to Reply



steve.taranovich

6/23/2012 1:21 PM EDT

Thanks for the memory IllinoisPE! Great story

Sign in to Reply



martin.rowe

6/23/2012 6:01 PM EDT

Take a look at slide 14, the inside control panel of the LEM. The control panel have two large knobs. My father worked for the company that made the knobs. See my blog post from July 20,2009. http://www.tmworld.com/blog/21794-My_piece_of_Apollo.php

Sign in to Reply



spaceaholic

8/26/2012 11:32 PM EDT

Martin....I acquire and preserve artifacts from the US Space Program with a particular emphasis on Project Apollo. The collection includes many items from the Lunar Module (as well as the Command Module and Saturn V). I have LM Control Panels which are shown on my website (go to URL http://www.spaceaholic.com/about.htm and click on the LEM & Saturn V page..the LM Control panels are listed several entries down the page).

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)