Design Article
Comment
Bill DeVille
The author's phrasing was a bit unfortunate, as I'm sure he didn't mean to imply ...
martinwinlow
If you have to pay the London congestion charge every weekday at UK£9/day then ...
Teardown: High-voltage Li-ion battery stack management - the drive for safe power
Stephen Evanczuk
7/31/2012 7:38 PM EDT
At the heart of the Chevrolet Volt, a sophisticated battery-stack management system ensures the safety and reliability of the multicell lithium-ion battery stack that delivers power on demand to the Volt drive system. Within the management system, battery-monitoring boards use two key subsystems to reliably monitor cell health and deliver digital results to a host processor that orchestrates system operation. Separating those subsystems, a signal interface ensures isolation between high-voltage battery-sensing circuitry and communications devices on the boards.
In this teardown, we review the challenges associated with high-voltage Li-ion battery-stack management in automotive applications and discuss how the overall architecture of the Chevy Volt battery-stack management system meets those challenges. In particular, we discuss the requirements for Li-ion cell monitoring and focus on the architecture and components used in the cell-monitoring subsystem, digital-communications subsystem, and isolation interface. We take an in-depth look at parts selected for this design, including a custom ASIC, the Freescale S9S08DZ32, the Avago ACPL-M43T, and the Infineon TLE6250G. Finally, we examine the benefits of this specific solution for mission-critical battery-stack management and consider the trade-offs with possible alternatives available for similar design challenges.
For further information about the role of isolation in automotive battery management systems, we have included a series of three in-depth video interviews.EV Challenges
Part 1 addresses the role of isolation in automotive battery management systems;
Part 2 looks at considerations for parts selection for these applications;
Part 3 examines the use of isolation devices in the Chevy Volt battery management system.
The Chevrolet Volt is the first production battery EV (electric vehicle), able to run nearly 40 miles solely on batteries. When battery charge reaches its lower limits, a gasoline engine engages to generate additional electricity to extend the vehicle’s range by several hundred miles. At the heart of the vehicle, a lithium-ion battery pack measuring 1.8m in length and weighing 181 kg generates the 16-kWh power needed to turn drive motors, power passenger features, and supply power to a sophisticated battery-management system that rivals avionic systems in its complexity.
IBM senior vice president Robert LeBlanc has noted that with its 10 million lines of code, the Volt’s software content surpasses the 7.5 million lines of code said to fly the US DOD F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter—a level of software content that itself more than triples the code content of current jet fighters, according to the US Government Accountability Office. While LeBlanc could probably have picked a less controversial system for comparison, the Volt does attract its own share of controversy. Perhaps no other vehicle has faced the same level of scrutiny as the Volt. Indeed, when a Volt test vehicle caught fire after sitting for weeks following a test crash, the incident kicked off a government agency review and a buyback offer from GM—even though no battery-related fires have occurred after "real-world crashes," according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Ultimately, the Volt’s success hinges on public acceptance—and its ability to perform. To that end, in designing the Volt, GM worked with IBM to simulate performance of the “system of systems” that power the Volt. Using detailed models of key systems, IBM software verified behavior and even generated key elements of the software code used in the Volt systems. That approach to code generation and systems modeling was crucial for ensuring performance of the Volt battery-management system because of the complex algorithms required to ensure optimal Li-ion cell performance and lifetime; indeed, optimizing such cells remains a highly active focus of research in industry, government, and academia. For the Volt, ensuring battery performance resulted in a final multiboard design (Figure 1) that orchestrates the operation of multiple embedded systems into a single system responsible for meeting the range, safety, performance, and extended-life requirements for the Volt's Li-ion battery pack.

Figure 1. The Chevy Volt battery management system partitions functions across multiple subsystems implemented in several PCBs. The focus of this teardown is the battery-interface control module—the red, blue, and green boards shown above in the second column from the right. (Courtesy of UBM TechInsights)
Next: Li-ion technology
Navigate to related information


jayhartvigsen
8/1/2012 5:20 PM EDT
With the exception of Figure 3 you attribute the S9S08DZ32 MCU to Fairchild. A search of the Fairchild website yields no hits for this number however a search of the Freescale website shows several hits (just leave off the leading S). I suspect the part is a Freescale MCU not a Fairchild MCU.
Sign in to Reply
Stephen.Evanczuk
8/1/2012 5:59 PM EDT
Good catch! It was definitely a case of overeager text expansion. It is indeed a Freescale MCU and the text has been corrected to indicate that. My apologies for the confusion.
Sign in to Reply
gman76
8/3/2012 3:56 PM EDT
10 million lines of code??? Can you do a 3-fingered salute when it won't do something that it should?
Sign in to Reply
Stephen.Evanczuk
8/4/2012 2:05 PM EDT
Well, I was curious about the ability to reboot so I checked with my local Chevy dealer's Volt mechanic and apparently the customer can't do that, but the service dept can do a reset. It's also interesting to note that the Freescale S9S08DZ32 MCU used in the sensing circuit has a self-reset feature (mentioned on page 4 of this article) that will reboot the MCU if the software locks up.
I'd love to hear from any Volt owners out there about there experiences with reset/(re)initialization.
Sign in to Reply
GizmoEV
8/4/2012 1:17 AM EDT
"The Chevrolet Volt is the first production battery EV (electric vehicle), able to run nearly 40 miles solely on batteries."
Apparently you don't study any history, not even GM's. What about the EV1, the S-10 EV, Ford Ranger EV, Toyota Rav4EV, Tesla Roadster, and several other EVs which easily go well over 40 miles on a charge. Also, an EV is just that, an Electric Vehicle. It only uses electricity and takes no other "fuel." The Volt is a hybrid. Unlike the Honda Insight, Toyota Prius (non-plug-in), and other so called hybrids. If it takes more than one type of fuel then it is a hybrid. My Honda Insight takes only gasoline, thus it is not a hybrid.
Sign in to Reply
gafisher
8/4/2012 10:09 AM EDT
The Chevy Volt is a hybrid; it's classified as an EV only (and dishonestly) to qualify for rebates and tax incentives. The Baker Electric, a true EV, had a range of 100 miles on a charge*; that was over a century ago, and even the Baker wasn't "... the first production battery EV (electric vehicle) able to run nearly 40 miles solely on batteries" (unless the claim was meant to stress the word "nearly").
True electric vehicles were common and popular a century ago, finally succumbing to gas primarily because carrying and replenishing gasoline was faster and easier than hitching up to a charger, exactly what most limits EVs to this day, and exactly why hybrids like the Volt still depend on the existing petrol infrastructure.
* http://www.popularmechanics.com/print-this/4215940?page=all
Sign in to Reply
Bill DeVille
8/22/2012 1:41 PM EDT
The author's phrasing was a bit unfortunate, as I'm sure he didn't mean to imply that the Volt was the first EV with a range of 40 miles.
I disagree that the term EV is dishonest, as applied to the Volt. The genius of GM's engineering approach is that, for a large percentage of driving in the real world, the Volt does operate as a true EV. That's why I bought one. But unlike the Leaf or the Tesla, the driving range of the Volt isn't limited to its battery capacity. I wouldn't have bought a "pure" EV, for that reason.
For some 7 years I commuted in a 2000 Honda Insight, a hybrid. My lifetime mileage in that vehicle was 63.5 MPG. That seemed remarkable to me. But the Insight was a two-seater, cramped, rough riding and weighed a bit more than 1,800 pounds. My wife refused to ride in it.
My lifetime mileage in the Volt is 209 MPG, and the trip odometer shows tha for the last 1,954.6 miles driven, I've burned 7.1 gallons of gas. That's 275.3 MPG, and I think that's REALLY remarkable. Most of the time the Volt has operated as a pure EV. It weighs more than twice as much as the Insight, is smooth, quiet and comfortable, with a high safety rating and better amenities such as audio and navigation. It's a good car.
Sign in to Reply
Stephen.Evanczuk
8/4/2012 10:54 AM EDT
@gafisher & @GizmoEV: Point taken. It's hard not to think of the latest (P)(H)EVs in a class by themselves given their underlying technology. Thanks for the pointer to the article. I wonder what Edison's take on the electric vehicle would be these days... The McKinsey study quoted at the end of this article sums it up well, where electric-powered vehicles will simply make economic sense in a few years. It sounds like both of you are close to this topic. Do you agree? What do you think about the timetable McKinsey suggests?
Sign in to Reply
martinwinlow
8/5/2012 8:23 AM EDT
If you have to pay the London congestion charge every weekday at UK£9/day then together with 'fuel' costs at aone tenth of what the equivalent petrol or diesel costs would be, we are already there. Ultimately the speed of the inevitable transition to EV from ICEVs will be driven by the price of petrol and diesel. IMO, one the global economy starts to pick up you can expect the prises of these commodities to sky rocket - doubling in as little as a couple of years. Add to that rapidly falling battery prices and government-driven incentives to kerb CO2 emissions and a motor vehicle (including large goods vehicles) market dominated by EVs is not far away at all.
Sign in to Reply