Design Article
Ensuring synchronous sampling of multiple high-frequency signal channels
Yves Maumary and Jean Manuel Dassonville, Agilent Technologies
7/18/2012 11:49 AM EDT
Defining the folding ambiguities
The method described above contains two inherent folding ambiguities, which are explained in the diagrams of Figure 1 [4].
In the figure, ti and tj are the phases from the sine fit converted into time. D is the sampling-clock delay and si the sampling interval. Red crosses represent the samples from the reference channel, with A marking the first sample. B marks the first sample of the measured channel, represented as blue circles. T is the period of the sine wave.
The first ambiguity, called trigger folding, is due to the trigger instant falling between B and the subsequent red cross (one sampling interval after A), or between A and the subsequent blue circle (one sampling interval after B). The current assumption is that the digitizer’s first sample in an acquisition always precedes the trigger instant by less than a sampling interval.
Therefore, if the trigger instant (which is common to both digitizers) arrives between A and the subsequent blue circle (second diagram), it means the hypothesis of A preceding B is false and it is necessary to subtract one sampling interval from the difference ti– tj to obtain the sampling-clock delay D.
The second ambiguity, called the sine-fi t folding, is due to the sine fit, which returns a phase of ±p. The trigger can fall at a time such that channel A has a negative phase and channel B a positive phase (Figure 1, bottom diagram). In such cases, the period T of the sine wave must be added to the ti– tj difference to obtain the sampling clock delay D.
Examining measurement results
A series of actual measurements shows the precise synchronization that is possible with the methods described above. The three key parameters were the synchronization states, the sampling-clock delay and the stability of the sampling-clock delay.
Configuring the measurement
The test setup used for the measurements reported below was composed of two 12-bit digitizers [6] (Figure 2).
The sine wave signal providing the time reference was produced by a synthesized signal generator. The signal amplitude was adjusted to be about 80 percent of full-scale input. To ensure the same signal was being fed into both channels, a 50 Ohm passive splitter was used to connect two cables of identical length. A similar splitter and identical length cables were used with a function/arbitrary waveform generator [7] to provide a trigger pulse.
The digitizers were controlled through a MATLAB® script. Care must be taken to ensure that both digitizers are armed and ready before a trigger pulse is sent, preferably by controlling the function generator with the MATLAB script.
The method described above contains two inherent folding ambiguities, which are explained in the diagrams of Figure 1 [4].
Figure 1: Two types of folding ambiguities — trigger folding and sine-fit folding — are present in the described measurement method.
In the figure, ti and tj are the phases from the sine fit converted into time. D is the sampling-clock delay and si the sampling interval. Red crosses represent the samples from the reference channel, with A marking the first sample. B marks the first sample of the measured channel, represented as blue circles. T is the period of the sine wave.
The first ambiguity, called trigger folding, is due to the trigger instant falling between B and the subsequent red cross (one sampling interval after A), or between A and the subsequent blue circle (one sampling interval after B). The current assumption is that the digitizer’s first sample in an acquisition always precedes the trigger instant by less than a sampling interval.
Therefore, if the trigger instant (which is common to both digitizers) arrives between A and the subsequent blue circle (second diagram), it means the hypothesis of A preceding B is false and it is necessary to subtract one sampling interval from the difference ti– tj to obtain the sampling-clock delay D.
The second ambiguity, called the sine-fi t folding, is due to the sine fit, which returns a phase of ±p. The trigger can fall at a time such that channel A has a negative phase and channel B a positive phase (Figure 1, bottom diagram). In such cases, the period T of the sine wave must be added to the ti– tj difference to obtain the sampling clock delay D.
Examining measurement results
A series of actual measurements shows the precise synchronization that is possible with the methods described above. The three key parameters were the synchronization states, the sampling-clock delay and the stability of the sampling-clock delay.
Configuring the measurement
The test setup used for the measurements reported below was composed of two 12-bit digitizers [6] (Figure 2).
Figure 2: With the Agilent U1066A Digitizers, this histogram of the measured sampling-clock delay has a mean value of 1.115 ns and a standard deviation of 3.475 ps.
The sine wave signal providing the time reference was produced by a synthesized signal generator. The signal amplitude was adjusted to be about 80 percent of full-scale input. To ensure the same signal was being fed into both channels, a 50 Ohm passive splitter was used to connect two cables of identical length. A similar splitter and identical length cables were used with a function/arbitrary waveform generator [7] to provide a trigger pulse.
The digitizers were controlled through a MATLAB® script. Care must be taken to ensure that both digitizers are armed and ready before a trigger pulse is sent, preferably by controlling the function generator with the MATLAB script.
Navigate to related information


Plavalli
7/23/2012 12:10 AM EDT
Can't seem to find #5 of the Notes in the article!
Sign in to Reply
Plavalli
7/23/2012 12:12 AM EDT
Did find it, but it comes after #7!
Sign in to Reply
Plavalli
7/23/2012 12:17 AM EDT
Can't find Figure 6!
Sign in to Reply