Breaking News
News & Analysis

Validity of New Feature Phone Market

2/27/2014 08:40 PM EST
24 comments
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
GSMD
User Rank
Manager
Re: Re : Validity of New Feature Phone Market
GSMD   3/2/2014 6:06:05 PM
NO RATINGS
I have to agree with alex_m1 here.

This whole feature phone vs smarphone and firefoxphone vs android is a bit of a redherring. It is better to examine the capacity of the USD25 HW and figure out what can run on it.

Back in 2006 when I demo'ed a concept phone platform at the MWC, 500 Mhz ARM11, a VGA display and 128MB of DDR was sufficient to run our variant of the  Opie platform, a Linux + Qt combo. Same Linux + Qt combo (which is what Tizen and Jolla's platform are at their core) runs well in a 500 Mhz Cortex 8 + 256 MB DDR2 today (I use this combo in OMAP3 processor based banking terminals running Linux apps).

The Spreadtrum platform is more powerful than this since an A7 will be faster than a A8.

Even an A5 is no slouch either.

Last time I checked a dual Cortex A9 combo with audio codec IC and power mgmt IC sold for USD7. A version with BB should probably be 10 for 2G. And these are at 10k volumes for a dual Cortex A9 that can run a 10 in tablet (I advise a mobile OEM, so these figures are accurate). A7 based parts will be cheaper since A7 is more optimal. Higher volumes prices on A5s and A7s can be significantly cheaper.

This will let it run a good optimized linux based applications, whether it be android, Qt or a run-time of your choice. Android may a little resource hungry but  will take only a little more memory with probably another 200Mhz. In fact if I am not mistaken this HW is not too far from the original iPhone or Droid HW. Display quality will be poorer of course.

So as alex_m1 pointed out probably another USD5 in BOM.  Assuming a generous 8% manufacturing cost, 40c extra for manufacturing. So we are talking about a USD6 spread.

So the vast price difference between a so called feature phone platform and an optimized android platform is a myth. The product price difference is due to positioning of the devices by the OEMs rather than indicative of major HW costs.

This implies that the mobile world is heading the PC way. For a vast majority of users, the low cost platform's capability has reached what a typical user wants. So faster CPUs buy you nothing other than greater battery life. And the everage user plays angry birds not a mobile version of an arcade game at 1080p resolution. Only component that has not reached commodity levels is good 720p/1080p displays. 4.5-5.5 in parts are still expensive and let us face it, for the vast majority of the users that this firefoxphone is aimed at, the phone will be primary internet device and a large display really counts.

 

alex_m1
User Rank
CEO
Re: Re : Validity of New Feature Phone Market
alex_m1   3/1/2014 6:11:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Here's an interesting and detailed examination of the firefox phone:

http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20140225VL200.html

Their conclusion is that it won't lead to a big difference in current prices.

alex_m1
User Rank
CEO
Re: Re : Validity of New Feature Phone Market
alex_m1   3/1/2014 5:58:58 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't get why the big wow is about. Yes firefox uses lower memory, but the difference between that and a low end android phone(256MB ram and extra 2GB) is less than $5(according to DramExchange). Assuming the $25 is BOM we're talking about less than 20% difference.


Also, previous versions of android we're targeted at low memory and there are many apps highly optimized for low resources. For example opera mini(which is so light it can even run on feature phones), and FB plus for facebook, a facebook app that takes only 121k, Not forgetting the huge app ecosystem android have which some of it could be usefull for these phones.

So until a decent comparison is made between FirefoxOS and a well optimizised low end android phone, i prefer to stay skeptical.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re : Validity of New Feature Phone Market
junko.yoshida   2/28/2014 6:26:37 PM
NO RATINGS
@betajet, agreed. Definitely a large number of Android community and tougher competition will contribute to the lower price. 

That said, it may be the time for Android-based hardware developers to start looking for something else to differentiate their handsets.

Anand.Yaligar
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Re : Validity of New Feature Phone Market
Anand.Yaligar   2/28/2014 4:11:51 PM
NO RATINGS
@betajet, I agree with your opinion. Why do you think people will buy feature phone for 170$ when they can buy a smartphone by paying 30$ more ?

betajet
User Rank
CEO
Re: Re : Validity of New Feature Phone Market
betajet   2/28/2014 2:50:07 PM
NO RATINGS
JMO: I would say that Android phones will keep getting cheaper because there are so many competitors.  Microsoft has to drop prices to compete with Android or their market share goes pffft.  Apple can keep coming out with new models with incremental improvements and charge the same high prices, and their fans customers will keep coming back because you're not "cool" unless you have the latest model.  The fact that they cost more makes them "cooler".

JMO/YMMV

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re : Validity of New Feature Phone Market
junko.yoshida   2/28/2014 2:17:41 PM
NO RATINGS
@Anand, that's a good question. I don't know what's going on with Windows phone, but as long as Android phones are concerned, that's exactly where they need to go if they are to proliferate in what used to be the feature phone terrritory.

Anand.Yaligar
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Predictions
Anand.Yaligar   2/28/2014 1:37:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Is data not a premium service compared to voice in the developing world as it is in the industrialized nations?

@AZskibum, I am regular user of mobile internet. I pay 2$ for 1GB of data on postpaid connection. But prices for 3G services are much higher compared to the 2G services.

Anand.Yaligar
User Rank
Rookie
Re : Validity of New Feature Phone Market
Anand.Yaligar   2/28/2014 1:30:14 PM
NO RATINGS
The simple feature phones with a better display screen would be able to achieve the same perfromance what a smart phone of today would do

@prabhakar, I totally agree with your opinion. I think eventually we will see feature phones with better hardware features which will give users very good alternative to the smartphones.

Anand.Yaligar
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Smartphone vs Computer
Anand.Yaligar   2/28/2014 1:17:34 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't know that we'll ever see sub 100 dollar PCs, or what that would look like exactly, but the demand for it would be there if someone could afford to make it.

@zewde, I dont think there will be demand for sub 100 dollors PCs because it will have very minimal feature. I think its better to buy sub 100 dollor tablet than buy sub 100 dollor PC.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week