Breaking News
News & Analysis

Analog computer trumps Turing model

Analog computer trumps Turing model
11/3/1998 07:16 PM EST
2 comments
NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Skywalker viking
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analog computer trumps Turing model
Skywalker viking   5/25/2016 9:58:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Hardware considerations seem to also play a part in evolution that is brushed aside sometimes in favor of theoretical equivalences. How a stable noise floor/zero is achieved could have a big influence, establishment a stable zero rather than trying to always theoretically beat it could be important.

Perhaps it depends a bit on intended use but- compared as discreet units,even an op amp of some kind processes more information,and in parellel,than a serial digital cpu and memory. In wave functions and fourier there is implicate and extricate order,all building block operations are availible at once and can be performed instantaneously together without discreet building of function one element at a time and iteration like a convential computer. Total temporal serialisation in a Turing system also has some drawbacks,the assertion that a working technology couldnt be many times more powerful than a Turing configuration sometimes seems rooted in the idea that analog and digital processing units are of equivalent power.

TheBookkeeper
User Rank
Author
re: Analog computer trumps Turing model
TheBookkeeper   7/23/2008 12:18:47 PM
NO RATINGS
A deeper question for analog versus digital computation asks, are there things an analog computer can do that digital computing cannot do. In my experience, which is important to a formal bookkeeping framework of rules, is to track and record the history of physically recursive structures. I have found no way to track such a history in relative real time without using both forms of computing, where analog versus digital become a language of rational complements.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed