Breaking News
News & Analysis

CPU designers debate multi-core future

2/6/2008 06:00 PM EST
1 Comment
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
ANON1251977588428
User Rank
Rookie
re: CPU designers debate multi-core future
ANON1251977588428   5/26/2008 7:22:56 PM
NO RATINGS
1. For the most parallel programming model you can think about the Informational Individual, as the final frontier in the software thinking!!For beginning http://gheorghematei.blogspot.com 2. "A class is a new data type." OK! But in the future we will solve problems without "new data types"!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm working to a new programming paradigm in software and ... without classes!!!! 3. The multi-core is not the solution. We are thinking as in the current model of programming. Here is the mistake. For the future we will work on a new software model -- the Informational Individual! The processor will build on a structure and functionality of Informational Individual not a C++ language. Now we are thinking as in 1970. Now the problems are in the kind of thinking in software. Here is the barrier.

Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll