Breaking News
News & Analysis

Fusion reactors inch toward commercialization

12/5/2008 00:00 AM EST
2 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Plurb
User Rank
Rookie
re: Fusion reactors inch toward commercialization
Plurb   12/8/2008 4:34:44 PM
NO RATINGS
I started as a R&D Tech at Eimac/Varian on the Megawatt Project in the mid 70's and I have watched the science evolve on Fusion. We are probably a lot closer than the researchers realize as they tend to stand too close to the action. I have always wondered why the toroidal shape for confinement? It would seem that since you are using magnetic fields genereated by RF the shape could be any kind of thermos bottle. Why not cylindrical and for that reason why not set up a confinement field of standing waves like a Klystron or a Flourescent Tube?

truant
User Rank
Rookie
re: Fusion reactors inch toward commercialization
truant   12/5/2008 3:35:16 PM
NO RATINGS
The ITER is the wrong answer. It is Negative power, and there is no plan to make it Positive power. MIT is going to add megawatts to the Negative power output. Polywell is the only viable fusion solution, it holds the world's record for DD fusions/second (at 10^9) and the cost is trivial compared to the ITER. It's Great science though! Keep it up.

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.