Breaking News
News & Analysis

Analysis: What an IBM-Sun merger would mean

3/18/2009 04:00 PM EDT
3 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
rich.nass
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analysis: What an IBM-Sun merger would mean
rich.nass   3/19/2009 12:03:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Excellent analysis. I disagree with Cidwind that it will hurt the software development comjunity. Sun was losing steam, and this will provide the boost it needs. While it may not be the help that developers need, it won't hurt.

Cidwind
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analysis: What an IBM-Sun merger would mean
Cidwind   3/19/2009 2:12:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Unfortunately a merge like this will hurt the engineering and software developing community. I for one am going to miss the open source fun Sun offered. I think crackers (often the confused hacker) will have a field day in a few years when all operating systems are company controlled, just wait till the programmer will have no control over his own security, very scary.

KS67
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analysis: What an IBM-Sun merger would mean
KS67   3/18/2009 8:39:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Makes sense. IBM secure computing environment is EXTREMELY profitable source of business to hook service revenue. "Secure computing" means many things - including finance (e.g. Wall Street). Excellent source of profits will evaporate due to consolidation in finance. This is about customer acquisition in complementary market using similar product(servers & computing). This is not a tech buy - sorry Sun. The unique Sun arch will melt away...

Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed