Breaking News
News & Analysis

Video: Al Gore stumps for smart grid

The case for the Grid 2.0
11/20/2009 04:00 PM EST
1 Comment
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
embeded
User Rank
Rookie
re: Video: Al Gore stumps for smart grid
embeded   11/23/2009 4:17:43 AM
NO RATINGS
Smart grid makes terrific sense for utilities that want to better control and manage their power grid. However, nobody's really made a convincing case for extending it into the home. I live in Boulder, CO, the first US city actually wired for Smart Grid (by Xcel, our electric utility, under a $100 million pilot program which is roughly $1000 per city resident). Each home is now connected to a specially installed fiber network, and smart meters have been put on each home, but so far little else is happening beyond a few demonstration homes. The problem is, as usual, the "last mile", in this case extending it into the home. No appliances or converter boxes with Smart Grid capability exist beyond prototypes. As the article says, standards are still in the proposal stage. Even if the technology was here now, why would I want to pay for it? I'm not about to replace a perfectly good appliance for one that has built-in Smart Grid capability. And even if converter boxes get down to $50 or so each, it would take an awfully long time to make that back in cost savings. Then there's the $1000 per capita installation fee. That's currently being paid for by Xcel and its partners, but in the small print there's a provision to charge the consumers for it if the program works and is kept in place (as it should be). For the eventual US build-out, that price will have to be charged over time directly to consumers. If I want to know when electricity is cheap to run my washer/dryer, I can just look it up on Xcel's website. If I need to know how much power my home entertainment center uses, I can just connect it to a $25 Kill-A-Watt meter to find out. Doing this on my major appliances did give me savings of about 15% overall year-over-year without significantly affecting my lifestyle. But second-by-second Smart Grid metering would only give me marginal savings beyond what I've already done. As the second video suggests, there are big privacy concerns. Google may be pure of heart, but many people here in Boulder already want electricity priced by *use* as well as by time of day. In other words, a KWH used for A/C should cost, say, twice as much as a KWH used to power a TV, even when consumed at the same time. These people want the city to do that kind of social engineering via taxes if Xcel does not do it via pricing. There's some legal precedence for this in that Xcel currently reports each residence's power use to the city so the city can tax each residence on consumption for its program to get the city "Kyoto compliant". Technical details and building infrastructure are easy. Economics and social concerns are much, much harder. Don't expect Smart Grid to be fully implemented for decades to come.

Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week