Breaking News
News & Analysis

Video: Intel Atom versus ARM Cortex-A9

1/7/2010 12:00 PM EST
4 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
salva004
User Rank
Rookie
re: Video: Intel Atom versus ARM Cortex-A9
salva004   1/15/2010 2:51:46 AM
NO RATINGS
Would you mind posting more details that would help one replicate what you've done. I'm interested in part-numbers and linux distros, etc.

LeeYC
User Rank
Rookie
re: Video: Intel Atom versus ARM Cortex-A9
LeeYC   1/8/2010 5:22:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Well, first of all parallel architecture isn't less challenge at all(maybe dual core isn't that bad). Secondly, merely using a limited amount of workload to compare two processor isn't fair. Showing those two CPUs could both open certain webpages isn't equal to similar overall performance. For example you could do any multiplication on a 10 dollars calculator or on a TI-89 and get correct results in a similar time. However, it doesn't mean 10 dollar calculator is powerful as TI-89.

Ratgebber
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Video: Intel Atom versus ARM Cortex-A9
Ratgebber   1/8/2010 4:01:31 AM
NO RATINGS
But this is exactly the point LeeYC... Why go to 1.6 GHz if you can match its performance with the right architecture? That could be less of a technological challenge which in turn would be cheaper to produce.

LeeYC
User Rank
Rookie
re: Video: Intel Atom versus ARM Cortex-A9
LeeYC   1/8/2010 3:43:22 AM
NO RATINGS
Well, is Atom also dual core? This comparison isn't very fair and somewhat misleading. Depending on the workload, a dual core processor with 500 MHz could be close to 1GHz theoretically. Anyway this video is from ARM, what can you expect?

Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll