Breaking News
News & Analysis

Analysis: Why did Micron buy Numonyx?

Analysis: Why did Micron buy Numonyx?
2/12/2010 01:00 AM EST
3 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 5 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
mark.lapedus
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analysis: Why did Micron buy Numonyx?
mark.lapedus   2/13/2010 5:16:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks NVM. Question: Will PCM thrive or die at Micron?

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Analysis: Why did Micron buy Numonyx?
resistion   2/13/2010 8:10:59 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree. At the very least the sell off of Numonyx represents a vote of no confidence on PCM by Intel and STM. I think Micron is trying to be an American Samsung. But the difference is, Asian governments generously support their semiconductor companies.

Volatile Memory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analysis: Why did Micron buy Numonyx?
Volatile Memory   2/12/2010 8:17:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice summary of the situation. Several points related to the phase-change memory angle, though: First, there is no evidence that Numonyx is on course to provide customers with samples of its 1-Gbit PCM in the first quarter of 2010. Numonyx promised last year to deliver prototypes in the second-half of 2009, and go into production by the end of 2009: www.eetimes.com/news/design/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=218100904&printable=true&printable=true But neither the prototypes nor the production ever materialized. Second, there is no race to bring PCM into the commercial markets. Numonyx claimed to have shipped their first PCM chip commercially in 2008: www.numonyx.com/en-US/About/PressRoom/Features/Pages/PCMships.aspx Yet, they had to admit recently that no commercial product on the market today uses their PCM chip. None. Not even one. Samsung apparently is not shipping any phase-change chips either (their mystery 512Mbit PRAM part K571228ACM is not even recognized as a valid product category on their web site). Third, Micron is not a stranger to PCM. In September of 1994, ECD (which invented phase-change memory in the late 1960s) granted Micron an exclusive, royalty-bearing license to the patents applicable to phase-change memory (Micron was supposed to pay $1.5 million per year to ECD prior to commercial production, and approximately 3% production royalties thereafter). Micron was allegedly looking for EEPROM/Flash and DRAM replacement, at lower cost, and was targeting 64-256Mbit chips at 350nm. The results were predictable. Like all results related to PCM since late 1960s. Note that this license agreement was signed about 6 years before Numonyx (then, Intel) got their license from ECD's JV. In 2004, Micron, 10 years after signing that "exclusive" license, declared that PCM does not scale: www.eetimes.com/news/semi/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=51201178 And that's the end of the story as far as PCM is concerned. May it now rest in peace, forever!

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.