Breaking News
News & Analysis

Counterpoint: 450-mm era still remote

5/29/2010 01:00 AM EDT
1 Comment
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
SteveSaunders
User Rank
Author
re: Counterpoint: 450-mm era still remote
SteveSaunders   6/8/2010 8:00:01 PM
NO RATINGS
In Tuesday's blog posting, Intel spokesperson Bill Kircos expanded on the status of Larabee, saying that Intel, "will not bring a discrete graphics product to market, at least in the short-term." Kircos said the company missed some key product milestones and determined that media and high-defintiion video, as well as mobile computing, are the important areas to focus on moving forward. Nathan Brookwood, principal of Insight64 (Saratoga, Calif.), said Intel originally had two goals when it started down the Larrabee path: develop a multi-core HPC processor and to deploy the same type of hardware as a high-performance graphics processor. Now it appears Intel is going to focus on the HPC market and never going to use Larrabee to build high-performance, discrete graphics GPUs, he said "The graphics part turns out to be a distraction," said Brookwood. "The market for high-performance discrete GPUs is a very narrow market and, by any measure, it is shrinking. Why would Intel spend a lot of money to target a market like that?" Intel remains focused on developing integrated graphics technologies for its processors, Kircos wrote. The blog also states that Intel intends to introduce a multi-core extension of its server product line, derived from Larrabee, at the International Supercomputing Conference in Germany next week. According to Brookwood, efforts to continue building high-end GPUs with more and more power now appears to be a losing proposition. Even ATI Technologies, the graphics chip unit of AMD, has backed away from building high-end graphics processors over the past two years, he said. ATI has been targeting the mid-range graphics market and serving the high-end with multiple GPUs, Brookwood said. Only Nvidia is still trying to build "the most humungous GPUs," Brookwood said, suggesting it is "one of the reasons they have struggled" over the past 18 months.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed