Breaking News
News & Analysis

Nvidia: ITC ruling won't affect customers

7/26/2010 10:12 PM EDT
6 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
nordicprince
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ITC ruling won't affect customers
nordicprince   8/4/2010 2:03:39 PM
NO RATINGS
what you guys are missing is rambus started offering their IP to the industry over 10 years ago...the industry blew them off, stole their IP, and conspired against the Intel selected rambus design for dram, driving it from the market...rambus is consistently winning in courts and government commissions...nvidia, samsung, etc....neither of these guys would have signed if they had not lost or were facing loss in courts...what's sad is rambus has to bring these companies to court to get what is legally theirs

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ITC ruling won't affect customers
KB3001   7/27/2010 7:41:58 PM
NO RATINGS
USPTO and the likes should perhaps be more strict in granting patents? I agree with Feory. At times I think the current IP protection system is defeating its purpose.New legislation should be put in place to put an end to certain abuses of the system, in my opinion.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ITC ruling won't affect customers
mcgrathdylan   7/27/2010 6:17:13 PM
NO RATINGS
@Feory- No argument here. Obviously it's a very complicated question, but what's the solution?

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ITC ruling won't affect customers
old account Frank Eory   7/27/2010 5:24:46 PM
NO RATINGS
Less than 2 weeks ago, Rambus proudly announced the issuance of their 1000th patent, and noted they have over 700 applications pending. For such a small company, this seems absurd. Yes, I know they are an IP licensing company, so patents are what fuel their revenue. But our patent system is so broken, at some point people are patenting things that were either already invented or are so obvious to a skilled engineer that nobody can design anything without infringing on someone's patent and risking a lawsuit. The patent madness has really gotten out of control over the last couple decades, to the point where the patent system is seriously stifling innovation.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ITC ruling won't affect customers
KB3001   7/27/2010 2:29:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Patent and IP lawyers are indeed the biggest beneficiaries of these stories. Sooner or later, the companies involved will come to a settlement.

goafrit
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ITC ruling won't affect customers
goafrit   7/27/2010 2:11:29 AM
NO RATINGS
There is nothing to worry. All these firms violate patents with ease and settle among themselves when lawyers have become richer. The reality is that engineers get peanuts while the lawyers smile home and depress earnings. I do not worry over these rulings because it is part of the trade. Sue me and I sue you; lawyers seat over a bottom of wine, sign some documents, visit the bank and everyone is settled. White House must not follow the ITC in this case. All semiconductor firms violate patents daily and Nvidia must not be destroyed. Nvidia must be careful that it does not go out of business. It just a bad press from Businessweek last week, now this one. They need to put that firm back to its old glorious days.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed