Breaking News
News & Analysis

Intel escapes fine, agrees to restrictions in FTC deal

8/4/2010 03:01 PM EDT
11 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 3 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
FH1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel escapes fine, agrees to restrictions in FTC deal
FH1   8/6/2010 6:41:44 AM
NO RATINGS
The real problem with ‘settlements’ like these is they legitimize unacceptable behaviour and that strikes at the very heart and soul of society. Whatever the grand posturing, this is an unequivocal whitewash with self-congratulations all round for the regulators who, in reality, have failed to protect the market. The real world knows this of course so all these 'slap on the wrist’ judgements do is to undermine regulatory authority. This is yet another bad day for capitalism and a sad day for America. It’s a sad day too when firms have to resort to cheating and dirty tricks to stay on top of the game. Regulators are there to rein back these excesses, not condone and legitimise them.

Dr. Phil
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel escapes fine, agrees to restrictions in FTC deal
Dr. Phil   8/6/2010 1:38:37 AM
NO RATINGS
I'll just say I'm flummoxed here. America has lost it soul

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel escapes fine, agrees to restrictions in FTC deal
goafrit   8/5/2010 12:13:00 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel has started a pattern that questions its ethical behavior in the market. When I was approached to join this great technical company, I was turned off because for all its microprocessor, Intel does not come our 'normal' to me. It fires staff anyone and bullies in the market. That is not the mark of a leader. They better learn how to act in this world

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Intel escapes fine, agrees to restrictions in FTC deal
rick merritt   8/4/2010 11:29:28 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd love to hear more comments from folks like BobbyTsai on whether access to PCI interfaces is enough to open the door for third-party graphics--or do they need access to cache coherent interconnects like Intel's QPI.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel escapes fine, agrees to restrictions in FTC deal
Robotics Developer   8/4/2010 10:23:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Given the speed of technology changes I would expect that in 10 years all of the chips/technology would not be relevant anymore. What is relevant is the settling of the the charges and the fair play ruling for Intel and non-Intel devices. I am a big fan of competition and using newly developed technologies to create market differentiations but blocking out competitors while good for self interest does not help consumers or technology advancements.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: Intel escapes fine, agrees to restrictions in FTC deal
mcgrathdylan   8/4/2010 10:14:46 PM
NO RATINGS
@CamilleK- agreed about the $2 million. It's hard to imagine that will cover the salaries of multiple technial people over 10 years. Even though the order is supposed to be in effect for 10 years, I get the feeling the FTC doesn't it expect to to be necessarily relevant for that long.

CamilleK
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel escapes fine, agrees to restrictions in FTC deal
CamilleK   8/4/2010 9:59:25 PM
NO RATINGS
The FTC should also not have agreed to their technical consultants being approved by Intel even if Intel paid for them. The $2 million limit over 10 years for the cost of those consultants seems on the low side. It would have been better to have a team of independent consultants under NDA. Alternatively if the consultants would not be acceptable, a reason should be given with an override by FTC a-la 'advise and possible no consent'.

bobbytsai
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel escapes fine, agrees to restrictions in FTC deal
bobbytsai   8/4/2010 9:39:50 PM
NO RATINGS
The agreement needs to cover QPI. It is needed to connect to IO hubs and interconnect CPUs in multi-processor systems. (can also be used for graphics processor and other co-processors). Guys @ FTC missed the boat on this one. Sure DMI and PCIe can be used but the high margin products are not included. AMD and Nvidia product were always 8-12 months ahead of Intel products before QPI. Without QPI, Nvidia / AMD / VIA / SIS can't provide a full market portfolio.

SallyF
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel escapes fine, agrees to restrictions in FTC deal
SallyF   8/4/2010 6:55:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel should have been fined a billion or so dollars, but more importantly the FTC should have pursued criminal charges as well. Why should "big oil" receive the brunt of media hatred while criminal monopolies like Intel and Microsoft escape prosecution? I need oil and gasoline, but I'm beginning to see that chips from Intel and bloatware from Microsoft aren't worth much. I say take the executives to court on criminal charges, and put them in shackles and orange jumpsuits to and from court, then put them in prison for long sentences. That should cut down on criminal behavior in the tech sector.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Intel escapes fine, agrees to restrictions in FTC deal
rick merritt   8/4/2010 5:44:38 PM
NO RATINGS
The fact Intel must offer a PCI interface on its processors should open the door for Nvidia to sell graphics and chip sets for all Intel parts without needing to license Intel's new QuickPath Interconnect, an agreement Nvidia had not been able to secure. That's big in itself.

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.