Design Con 2015
Breaking News
News & Analysis

Research consortium touts air-gap for PC boards

8/17/2010 04:01 AM EDT
11 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
re: Research consortium touts air-gap for PC boards
docdivakar   8/30/2010 7:46:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting concept but I second the concerns on reliability and cost addition expressed by other commentators above. We can get highspeed controlled impedance boards today with the proper selection of core and prepeg materials, without the added process costs needed for airgaps. What about thermal concerns? The air pockets can act as islands of heat and cause unintended thermal effects. How about the thermal expansion behaviour in the Z-direction, typically higher than the XY CTE? Even when used in chips, one has to carefully evaluate the effects of any TSV's in the vicinity of air gaps when used in a 3D stack. MP Divakar

Paul Kohl
User Rank
Rookie
re: Research consortium touts air-gap for PC boards
Paul Kohl   8/19/2010 12:53:18 PM
NO RATINGS
The electric field is below the threshold voltage. Generally, it is lower than that for air-gaps on chips (inter-layer dielectric on-chip), which have been shown to be successful. Also, the breakdown voltage can be improved by adding a liner to the copper (should it be needed).

SiFarmer (Ret.)
User Rank
Rookie
re: Research consortium touts air-gap for PC boards
SiFarmer (Ret.)   8/18/2010 8:54:55 PM
NO RATINGS
What about the basic air-gap breakdown?(~E4V/cm =1V/um)i.e. sparks!

Paul Kohl
User Rank
Rookie
re: Research consortium touts air-gap for PC boards
Paul Kohl   8/17/2010 9:36:25 PM
NO RATINGS
The dielectric loss on boards and substrates becomes a serious problem at higher frequency, and as power becomes a more important factor. The energy per bit is significanly lower as the permittivity and loss of the dielectric is lowered. The mechanical strength of the overcoat material is quite good. Physical processes that would rupture these structures would do significant damage to any board. They travel quite well and are easy to handle and work with.

Paul Kohl
User Rank
Rookie
re: Research consortium touts air-gap for PC boards
Paul Kohl   8/17/2010 9:32:10 PM
NO RATINGS
A description can be found at: Jayachandran, J.P.; Reed, H.A.; Zhen, H.; Bidstrup Allen, S.A.; Kohl, P.A. Air-Channel Fabrication for Microelectromechanical Systems Via Sacrificial Photosensitive Polycarbonates. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 2003, 12 (2), pp 147–159.

Paul Kohl
User Rank
Rookie
re: Research consortium touts air-gap for PC boards
Paul Kohl   8/17/2010 9:30:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Dear Rich, You can obtain background publications on this at: http://www.chbe.gatech.edu/kohl/Publications.html The all-copper process bring little or no new chemcials or processing into a packaging or chip fab b/c it uses essentially the same chemicals as that for boards and chips. The signal attenuation on substrate is greatly reduced. Sincerely, Paul Kohl

pixies
User Rank
Rookie
re: Research consortium touts air-gap for PC boards
pixies   8/17/2010 5:56:52 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree with the previous messages, the reliability will be the biggest challenges of this technology.

selinz
User Rank
Manager
re: Research consortium touts air-gap for PC boards
selinz   8/17/2010 5:50:30 PM
NO RATINGS
This sounds like a somewhat messy process. Higher bandwidth PCB are designed with 50ish ohm characteristics. The difference between modern high performance dielectrics and air don't really provide a compelling reason to sacrifice mechanical integrity. This makes sense for chips where current lithography and fabrication technology supports this and the structures are very small. However, with PCB's, it's not clear to me why this would be of benefit. Using a low K dielectric that has some mechanical integrity seems to be a much more tractable solution.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
re: Research consortium touts air-gap for PC boards
R_Colin_Johnson   8/17/2010 2:09:08 PM
NO RATINGS
SRC and Georgia Tech claim that the PC board materials allow the vapors to permeate, but they admit that the heating step must be performed slowly enough to make it all escapes.

BalaLak
User Rank
Rookie
re: Research consortium touts air-gap for PC boards
BalaLak   8/17/2010 9:24:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Questions that pop up in my mind: How does the vapor escape without getting trapped anywhere? Any vapor trapped will surely lead to failure. Well, how would one go about failure analysis of such boards?

Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week