Breaking News
News & Analysis

IBM characterizes single-atom DRAM

9/23/2010 06:31 PM EDT
14 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
krisi
User Rank
Author
re: IBM characterizes single-atom DRAM
krisi   9/28/2010 10:33:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Pixies: That STM will have to move very fast ;-)...agreed on IBM replacing Bell Labs as the only company worldwide that is doing fundamental research. I wonder how long this will last, I guess they see long term economical benefits...Kris

pixies
User Rank
Author
re: IBM characterizes single-atom DRAM
pixies   9/27/2010 6:29:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Colin, the readout circuit will be an STM operating under ultra high vacuum, that will be a huge boost to IBM's microscope business. :) That said, I think IBM has now replaced the defunct Bell Labs to be the leader in fundamental research.

unknown multiplier
User Rank
Author
re: IBM characterizes single-atom DRAM
unknown multiplier   9/25/2010 3:31:39 AM
NO RATINGS
It's refreshing to see occasional science-type articles instead of the usual fuel for engineering cynicism.

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
re: IBM characterizes single-atom DRAM
R_Colin_Johnson   9/24/2010 11:04:29 PM
NO RATINGS
You guys are absolutely right. In fact, I didn't include any calculations as to memory densities possible with a single-atom DRAM, because there is a lot more to it than just the bit cell material. But we must remember that IBM is currently just characterizing atomic-scale materials, not designing read-write mechanisms for atomic-scale bit cells. But as I've said before, characterization precedes realization, and its new pulsed-STM should facilitate the characterization of atomic-scale memory, photovoltaic and quantum-computing materials.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: IBM characterizes single-atom DRAM
krisi   9/24/2010 8:51:57 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree with "selinz", this article is more about STM than memory implications. In all these futuristic discussion people seem to forget that you need to get a signal out somehow. So you build 10E15 (or 10E23 as "green_ee" asks) memory cells and then what??? Kris

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
re: IBM characterizes single-atom DRAM
R_Colin_Johnson   9/24/2010 4:37:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes the long-term advantage of having nanoscale time resolution for STMs is the most important aspect of IBM's work, but their first example of its use revealed that DRAM bit cells based on a single iron atoms would have to be refreshed every 250 nanoseconds--which seems like an unreasonably short time. Nevertheless, characterization precedes realization, so this is at least a start toward single-atom bit cells for DRAM.

selinz
User Rank
Author
re: IBM characterizes single-atom DRAM
selinz   9/24/2010 4:21:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, the headline does the article a dis-service. The signficance is the improvement in STM, not the DRAM implications. Cool stuff..

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: IBM characterizes single-atom DRAM
resistion   9/24/2010 6:45:23 AM
NO RATINGS
What temperature was this carried out? So a single stored spin only lasts 250 ns?

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
re: IBM characterizes single-atom DRAM
R_Colin_Johnson   9/23/2010 11:09:32 PM
NO RATINGS
These are almost theoretical calculations, since even at the "ultimate" density of one bit per atom, you still have to have build support circuitry to set and read-out the bits. But now I'm remembering the clear polymer memory blocks used by the HAL 9000 computer in 2001: A Space Odyssey (film). I guess those could have held some kind of atomic lattice memory. What do you think?

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Author
re: IBM characterizes single-atom DRAM
R_Colin_Johnson   9/23/2010 11:01:27 PM
NO RATINGS
IBM's recent characterization of an atomic-scale memory bit is the first step toward the realization of such atomically accurate semiconductor materials. The pulsed-STM essentially makes super slow-motion movies of semiconductor processes on the atomic scale. Check out how it works on this video at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xHIg1qNRc

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed