Design Con 2015
Breaking News
News & Analysis

Analyst: Intel preparing 450-mm push

10/25/2010 07:16 PM EDT
17 comments
NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Analyst: Intel preparing 450-mm push
goafrit   10/25/2010 7:35:44 PM
NO RATINGS
It is a bold initiative for Intel to invest in America. That is how the future of the nation will be secured. It is necessary and should be commended by all. One hopes they have the right roadmap for the litho business.

mark.lapedus
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analyst: Intel preparing 450-mm push
mark.lapedus   10/25/2010 8:16:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Does 450-mm make any sense or not?

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: Analyst: Intel preparing 450-mm push
mcgrathdylan   10/25/2010 11:51:51 PM
NO RATINGS
With Intel pushing 450-mm the way they are, it seems like a no brainer that this facility will be built to accommodate 450-mm. Considering how soon Intel would like 450-mm to be ready, it would seem short sighted not the build the development fab to accommodate it. Of course 450 won't be ready when Intel wants it. But Intel needs to walk the walk. I wouldn't be surprised to see them make some public statements about this facility being 450-ready as a way to draw a line in the sand, so to speak. I was actually kind of surprised that they didn't state this in the announcement.

RobDinsmore
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analyst: Intel preparing 450-mm push
RobDinsmore   10/26/2010 3:34:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel does not fully invest in America. None of it's Etch tools come from the US. This is in spite of the fact that LAM, based 5 miles or so from Intel's HQ is the market leader in Etch. It's really kind of sad for them because they miss out on the great collaborative nature that Intel's think films groups have with the US based tool manufacturers. To truly invest in America, Intel needs to invest in it's American partnerships and that means seriously considering dumping some money on American made and supported Etch tools. It will create more jobs in the US than just building another high tech sweat shop for Ph.D.s.

dnenni
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analyst: Intel preparing 450-mm push
dnenni   10/26/2010 3:55:33 AM
NO RATINGS
450mm Semiconductor Manufacturing is an interesting debate: http://wp.me/psH60-1x5 My guess is that we will see 450mm by the end of the end of the decade.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Analyst: Intel preparing 450-mm push
resistion   10/26/2010 6:09:21 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel's 22 nm chips are coming out next year. It is almost certainly too late to do anything about 15 nm now. In two-three years, 11 nm node process needs to be frozen by Intel. I don't think any wafer size change or EUV lithography will happen during that time. It is just too soon. They would rather focus on changing the transistor from planar to 3D.

USInnovate
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analyst: Intel preparing 450-mm push
USInnovate   10/26/2010 4:43:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Long term 450 mm makes sense but only for a limited set of semiconductor products with the volumes to achieve the cost benefits. The key question regarding 450 mm is how to get it done. Is there a smarter way (than 300 mm project) to fund and develop the technology?

Ineedyourhelp
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analyst: Intel preparing 450-mm push
Ineedyourhelp   10/26/2010 6:27:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Like Reagan's Star Wars program, Intel could be feigning the 450mm to suck Samsung into an over-spending trap. Protectionist Samsung would try to do the 450mm utilizing their Korean supply chain. It would fail, sapping Samsung's R&D resources.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
re: Analyst: Intel preparing 450-mm push
wilber_xbox   10/26/2010 7:40:47 PM
NO RATINGS
I think that 15nm and 11nm will be quite interesting nodes as the cost will certainly be an issue with double patterning or even quadrapatterning. I do not see any other technology replacing conventional lithography in 4/5 yrs.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
re: Analyst: Intel preparing 450-mm push
wilber_xbox   10/26/2010 7:44:07 PM
NO RATINGS
The cost of 450mm wafer fab is certainly an issue but as the cost at 15nm or 11nm node will be an huge issue in itself then it makes more sense to cancel the high cost of the nodes with going for larger wafer. I expect that most of the foundries will not be able to bear the huge initial investment of 450mm fab so there will be partnerships and collaborations.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week