Breaking News
News & Analysis

Microchip adds license for MIPS32 M14K cores, expands 32-bit MCU options

10/28/2010 04:18 PM EDT
6 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Sanjib.A
User Rank
CEO
re: Microchip adds license for MIPS32 M14K cores, expands 32-bit MCU options
Sanjib.A   10/30/2010 5:54:56 PM
NO RATINGS
The Design Article "Why MIPS is just a number" by Gaurang Kavaiya on 10/03/2010 might also be of interest. The URL is goven below: http://www.eetimes.com/design/embedded/4209273/Why-MIPS-is-just-a-number

Sanjib.A
User Rank
CEO
re: Microchip adds license for MIPS32 M14K cores, expands 32-bit MCU options
Sanjib.A   10/30/2010 8:45:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Thank you all for keeping this discussion alive. As I am aware, the architecture of the processor matters when the processor is operated with stringent power/performance/size constraints as Smith mentioned. @Patk0317: It will be helpful if you share your thoughts about argument presented in the article you are referring to, which says the processor architecture is not that important.

Silicon_Smith
User Rank
Rookie
re: Microchip adds license for MIPS32 M14K cores, expands 32-bit MCU options
Silicon_Smith   10/29/2010 5:06:54 AM
NO RATINGS
I disagree. As Sanjib mentioned below, assuming that the power and performance are similar would be incorrect. Infact, the major differentiator in many cases would be how much power a MCU would consume(making it more or less suitable for a given application) and also the performance. An architecture can result in lesser cycles/task and hence maximize the performance. Of course, you could abstract it all up to C, but when it comes to running applications under power/performance/size constraints, an architecture is all that makes a difference!

Sanjib.A
User Rank
CEO
re: Microchip adds license for MIPS32 M14K cores, expands 32-bit MCU options
Sanjib.A   10/29/2010 3:27:49 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the interesting topic you have brought up for the discussion. I agree that "assuming similar performance and power, then the selection criteria are the 3P's". But is that assumption correct? Is the performance more or less independent of the MCU architecture...even when the MCU is more than 75-80% loaded?

jg_
User Rank
Rookie
re: Microchip adds license for MIPS32 M14K cores, expands 32-bit MCU options
jg_   10/28/2010 6:38:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Assuming similar performance and power, then the selection criteria are the 3P's: Peripherals, Pinout, Price. As core opcodes continue to change and branch (as in this example), binary compatible operation is quietly mentioned less; The expectation is the user is insulated from that, by 'target reselect and rebuild'. aka HLL use. Floating point may become a new differentiator, but is that a Core, or a Peripheral ?

Patk0317
User Rank
CEO
re: Microchip adds license for MIPS32 M14K cores, expands 32-bit MCU options
Patk0317   10/28/2010 5:47:28 PM
NO RATINGS
I read an article yesterday that claims the MCU architecture is not all that important if you can code in C. The peripherals that are included on the silicon are the reason to pick a particular companies MCU. What do you think? Agree? Disagree? Why?

Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week