Breaking News
News & Analysis

Qualcomm has bought Sandbridge, says analyst

11/3/2010 12:24 PM EDT
3 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm has bought Sandbridge, says analyst
elctrnx_lyf   11/3/2010 5:15:55 PM
NO RATINGS
LTE is in the news for all the reasons. With so much drive behind the LTE for the mobiles, definitely LTE will be a promising technology to deliver the broad band speeds for the mobiles. How does Quallcom willbe able to integrate the LTE software defined stack into the CDMA baseband ASIC? What is the market growth for the Qullcomm in the area of LTE?

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm has bought Sandbridge, says analyst
krisi   11/3/2010 3:23:07 PM
NO RATINGS
I think I said it before, acquisition of fables IC companies has been historically very difficult so I would not bet that the acquisition waive is coming...key people cash their stock options and leave...so it only makes sense if there is truly innovative technology left behind, which might be true in this case...Kris

goafrit
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm has bought Sandbridge, says analyst
goafrit   11/3/2010 1:02:10 PM
NO RATINGS
This is the beginning of the new wave of acquisition and post recession consolidation. Congrats to Qualcomm. That seems to be a good one

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed