Design Con 2015
Breaking News
News & Analysis

U.S. patent awards up 31 percent in 2010

1/10/2011 06:24 AM EST
11 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: U.S. patent awards up 31 percent in 2010
eewiz   1/10/2011 12:59:17 PM
NO RATINGS
31% increase!! Now thats impressive. Anyone knows what was the growth rate last year & the year before? With lot of patent trolls on the move, companies have no choice but to file for every patent they possibly can. Guess it also shows US is still the intellectual capital of the world. BTW where are the china numbers? Or you dont count it because of lack of IP law enforcements? ~6K patents for IBM :)!! If I am not wrong they are focusing on services these days. Then what to do with all these patents?

antiquus
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. patent awards up 31 percent in 2010
antiquus   1/10/2011 5:16:53 PM
NO RATINGS
I think that more pertinent would be statistics about the acceptance/rejection rate. If acceptance is up 31% in real numbers, is this because more applications were input, or because the overwhelmed examiners rubber-stamp anything that has a new way of wording the proposition, and are rejecting a smaller percentage?

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. patent awards up 31 percent in 2010
old account Frank Eory   1/10/2011 10:28:37 PM
NO RATINGS
The USPTO did not increase the number of examiners by 31%, so most likely the existing examiners got a lot more efficient with that rubber stamp. I hope I'm wrong. We already have one industry that got itself in lots of trouble for taking a robo-signing approach to important documents :)

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
re: U.S. patent awards up 31 percent in 2010
Sheetal.Pandey   1/10/2011 10:40:29 PM
NO RATINGS
well its a good news. To a great extent I also agree that US companies give great importance to research and patent studies. They have the best of everything in the world.

selinz
User Rank
CEO
re: U.S. patent awards up 31 percent in 2010
selinz   1/10/2011 11:43:20 PM
NO RATINGS
wrt IBM patents, they still have a very large R&D arm. I suspect that more than 75% of those patents come from their R&D, a group that is undoubtedly graded on patents, among other things.

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: U.S. patent awards up 31 percent in 2010
chanj0   1/11/2011 12:54:21 AM
NO RATINGS
Presumably, the patents can be turned into a prototype if they haven't turned into one. It's a good news to US corporations.

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
re: U.S. patent awards up 31 percent in 2010
docdivakar   1/14/2011 8:36:17 PM
NO RATINGS
@Rick Merritt: it would be interesting to know what % of the increase came from the so called greentech/cleantech patent applications which were given a fast track approval process. @Frank Eory: USPTO did hire a number of positions in the late 2008 and early 2009 time frame to prep for the increase in greentech filings. It also outsources some of its work. Now a days, its examiners are also spread out at various locations in the US, working from home offices (not publicized much!). Dr. MP Divakar

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: U.S. patent awards up 31 percent in 2010
DrQuine   1/15/2011 6:08:16 PM
NO RATINGS
It may be misleading to say that "The economy doesn't appear to have slowed patent flow significantly in the U.S. Patents have a long lead time, the 31% increase in patents in 2010 reflect examiners completing reviews of patents that were filed years earlier. For example, my 4 issued patents in 2010 were the results of applications filed in August 2003, September 2005, August 2006, and December 2006.

zeeglen
User Rank
Blogger
re: U.S. patent awards up 31 percent in 2010
zeeglen   1/15/2011 8:07:04 PM
NO RATINGS
It was about 12 years ago we were working with a patent attorney on a new design. During a coffee break we got to discussing "frivolous patents". The attorney told us there were many such patents on things such as the purchasing algorithm for internet commerce. Once an entrepreneur (read "scam artist") obtained a patent on his purchase algorithm his next step was to con investors into financing his scheme, the sucker-bait being "I own the patent" and having the paperwork to prove it. A few years later got hints that large corporations that could afford to patented every single little thing possible. Then they traded blocks of patents back and forth ("you can use our patents if we can use your patents"). Has anything really changed? Mind you, what I have said is as heard from others, I make no claim that these observations are based on fact.

Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll