Breaking News
News & Analysis

Is fab tool business model broken?

1/18/2011 05:19 PM EST
15 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 3 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
resistion   1/19/2011 2:19:06 PM
NO RATINGS
If they had one bad generation of tools just at the time it was most needed, that is enough to set them back, as the next time, customers would have some doubts. I suspect this happened with their last dry ArF tool. So they couldn't recover enough business in the immersion stage.

Hephaestus
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
Hephaestus   1/18/2011 10:31:01 PM
NO RATINGS
The fab tool business has become a winner-takes-all endeavor, and that is the way the industry has shaped it. Consortia will not change this.

yalanand
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
yalanand   1/18/2011 9:18:30 PM
NO RATINGS
What is the reason behing ASML success ? 80% of Lithography market share is quite whopping figure. What was the reason NIKON faired so badly ?

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
goafrit   1/18/2011 9:16:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes. It is broken. Why invest $20b to be upstaged by new technology within 18 months. It is a tough business and I will suggest fabs be built by industry consortia than individual companies.

CSRivera
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is fab tool business model broken?
CSRivera   1/18/2011 6:39:10 PM
NO RATINGS
If the equipment vendor base is to consolidate, and their R&D dollars to be more efficiently allocated, would it be too much to ask (or demand) tools better suited to our highly integrated fabs? Far too often we obtain tools which must be tailored in to our integrated fabs. Too often, certain "wheels/subsystems" have been reinvented, when the previous subsystems were only in need of evolution. Basic subsystems such as pattern recognition, user interfaces, databases, diagnostics, etc. need not be reinvented. What we need are "plug-and-play" tools. Yes, this will require some standardization amongst the vendors and manufacturers, but this is essential if we are to accelerate our technologies.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.