Breaking News
News & Analysis

Update: MIT, TI tip 28-nm app processor

2/21/2011 02:05 AM EST
5 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: Update: MIT, TI tip 28-nm app processor
daleste   2/21/2011 2:15:30 AM
NO RATINGS
Its good to see that TI is still pursuing new products in DSP on not just focused on analog.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Update: MIT, TI tip 28-nm app processor
eewiz   2/21/2011 6:47:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Processors running in subthreshold region is not a new thing. Many IEEE JSSC and TCAS-I papers already has similar implementations. Probably in 28nm it is a first attempt.

TingLu
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: MIT, TI tip 28-nm app processor
TingLu   2/21/2011 6:39:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Video scaling is old but down to half of nominal voltage is very interesting. What is static power difference between in 1.0v and 0.5v?

g-gammie
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: MIT, TI tip 28-nm app processor
g-gammie   2/23/2011 12:27:36 AM
NO RATINGS
Thank you for the article, Mark, and for taking the time to connect about everything. We certainly appreciate it! TingLu, to answer your question about video scaling: The static or leakage power scales approximately 13X from 1.0V down to 0.5V. – Gordon (TI)

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.