Breaking News
News & Analysis

Update: Plutonium-laced fuel heightens Japan's nuke woes

3/15/2011 00:05 AM EDT
50 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 5   >   >>
the_floating_ gate
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: Plutonium-laced fuel heightens Japan's nuke woes
the_floating_ gate   3/15/2011 5:03:09 AM
NO RATINGS
Sodium cooled fast breeder technology? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SNR-300

kdboyce
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: Plutonium-laced fuel heightens Japan's nuke woes
kdboyce   3/15/2011 6:17:32 AM
NO RATINGS
There have been many 'reports' about the nuclear power plant problems in Japan as a result of the MAJOR earthquake/tsunami double whammy Japan has suffered. However, I must give kudus to Colin on this article for his clarity in explaining the failures. It is hard to get some details out of the mainstream press. While one can always bemoan the fact that the failures occurred, as well as the reasons for them, in general nuclear power has worked well in Japan for nearly 40 years.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Update: Plutonium-laced fuel heightens Japan's nuke woes
resistion   3/15/2011 2:37:51 PM
NO RATINGS
These radioactive isotopes are really heavy compared to water or air, shouldn't they settle to ground very quickly? The greater danger would be they would seep into groundwater and become part of the food cycle.

Kenlbear
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: Plutonium-laced fuel heightens Japan's nuke woes
Kenlbear   3/15/2011 7:23:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Please read, "INIR - International Nuclear Incident Response" in www.snowflakehell.blogspot.com

Maleficent
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: Plutonium-laced fuel heightens Japan's nuke woes
Maleficent   3/15/2011 7:27:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Brilliant article on a terrible subject. Let's hope that the prevailing winds continue to blow radioactive fumes to sea. Before reading your article, Colin, I had thought that Tokyo was "safe" from contamination. Now I am not so sure. Time will tell. Let's hope that it plays in Japan's favor this time.

jarg
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: Plutonium-laced fuel heightens Japan's nuke woes
jarg   3/15/2011 7:35:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Here is the technology we should go with: http://energyfromthorium.com/

SPLatMan
User Rank
Manager
re: Update: Plutonium-laced fuel heightens Japan's nuke woes
SPLatMan   3/15/2011 8:00:04 PM
NO RATINGS
@jarg: Agreed. Thorium seems to be a potential winner. The Indians have a working Th reactor. It has been suggested that "Obama could kill fossil fuels overnight with a nuclear dash for thorium," and could put "an end to our dependence on fossil fuels within three to five years." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium#Thorium_as_a_nuclear_fuel David Stonier-Gibson http://splatco.com

deanb
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: Plutonium-laced fuel heightens Japan's nuke woes
deanb   3/15/2011 8:05:30 PM
NO RATINGS
What I have not seen anyone attempt to explain is why it takes such an incredibly long time to get the reactor cooled down even though supposedly the reaction was halted immediately. Even when the circulation system is working normally it sounds like it takes a very long time? And this article said used fuel rods are placed in a pool for "10-20 years" just to cool down? It can't possibly take that long but must be primarily a safe storage area until they get around to shipping the used rods to safe storage.

ANON1235460098216
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: Plutonium-laced fuel heightens Japan's nuke woes
ANON1235460098216   3/15/2011 8:34:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Unfortunately, there is no "safe" storage for spent nuclear fuels, which remain dangerous for hundreds of thousands of years. The earth is still mostly a ball of molten rock and metal, despite the cooled crust on which we live. On a geological time frame, there simply is no part of the earth's crust stable enough to store the spent fuel.

ANON1235460098216
User Rank
Rookie
re: Update: Plutonium-laced fuel heightens Japan's nuke woes
ANON1235460098216   3/15/2011 8:44:33 PM
NO RATINGS
40 years doesn't seem like much of a track record, considering the enormous risks. Plutonium is the most lethal substance known -- just one pound is sufficient to kill every person on earth. Studies have shown that abundant power is available, with current technology, from Solar and Wind. The only real barrier is that it would take about 20 years, even if we started today, to replace our fossil fuel infrastructure. But think of jobs 20 years of Solar and Wind construction could create!!

Page 1 / 5   >   >>
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week