Breaking News
News & Analysis

Atomic superconductor one-ups squid

4/1/2011 11:10 PM EDT
6 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
selinz
User Rank
CEO
re: Atomic superconductor one-ups squid
selinz   4/4/2011 7:58:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Every once in a while, the physicists who get obscene research dollars have to put buzzwords on their explanations to justify future dollars. That's what this sounds like to me.

subman
User Rank
Rookie
re: Atomic superconductor one-ups squid
subman   4/4/2011 1:46:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Calling it "perpetual motion" when it lasts 40 seconds seems a bit odd. Even if it was 40 hours, that is still a long way from perpetual...

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Atomic superconductor one-ups squid
goafrit   4/3/2011 12:00:50 PM
NO RATINGS
very interesting.

Kinnar
User Rank
CEO
re: Atomic superconductor one-ups squid
Kinnar   4/2/2011 11:19:52 AM
NO RATINGS
It is interesting but tough to say that this is super conductivity as it will be quite hard to find the resistance offered by this circulating ring.

kdboyce
User Rank
Rookie
re: Atomic superconductor one-ups squid
kdboyce   4/2/2011 6:43:21 AM
NO RATINGS
Colin - a question. Once the flow is stopped by the laser, what starts it again? It is not clear whether or not the flow needs restarting from an external source, e.g. electric field or what? What am I missing?

Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll