Breaking News
News & Analysis

Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?

4/6/2011 07:00 PM EDT
11 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
NimrodO0l1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why is TSMC moving into 450-mm?
NimrodO0l1   6/12/2012 8:07:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Not sure I understand the reduction in engineers either, but you should get twice the parts per wafer without a shrink due to doubling of area. If you do a shrink, you might get twice again. If the number of process steps is about constant, then you expect 4x the parts per operator hour. Intel and others have estimated a 30%+ in cost per chip. It would appear that much of it comes from reduced human hours per chip.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll