PORTLAND, Ore.—Electrical engineers from the University of Michigan claim to have invented a technique for micro-machining piezoelectric MEMS that generate 10-times more energy than conventional energy harvesters. The research team said a penny-sized piezoelectric MEMS could generate enough electricity to power medical implants in the body and wireless sensors on motor vehicles.
The energy harvester market for wireless sensor networks is expected to $450 million by 2015, according to Erkan Aktakka, one of the system's developers, working in the lab of professor Khalil Najafi, principle scientist on the project.
The team packaged its bulk micro-machined MEMS together with tiny circuit elements that form a complete vibration energy harvester in just 27 cubic millimeters. The tiny unit can harvest vibrational energy between 14-and-155 cycles-per-second (Hz) to produce about 200 microWatts from 1.5g vibrations. The energy harvester charges a supercapacitor to 1.85 volts, whereupon it powers-up the wireless sensor whose battery is it replacing. The researchers estimate the energy harvester could repeat this cycle for 10-to-20 years without degradation.
Details of the design will be revealed by the researchers in a presentation at Transducers 2011 (June 5-9, Beijing).
Funding was provided by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network.
Self-contained energy harvester converts vibrations into electricity using bulk micromachined piezoelectrics.
most aplications will have a well defined vibration frequency but many will not.
Why not design the mems so that the respond to a broader range of frequencie so as to have higher probability of energy being in the pass band of the converter?
Thus harmonics and/or subharmonic frequency components along with the fundametals would most alway fall into the passband.
How do garentee orentaition?
Are the mems designed to except vibration in any direction or do they need to be "inplane"?
That is are the MEMS 3D?
IR losses stop this size reduction, also the step up ratio needs the wire length.
But it could be broken up into smaller components for highth reduction for example at the cost of adding extra componnets
yes just broadcast the energy amplitude and frequency or monitor on sensor, anyway this signal alone could trigger a physical inspection of the bridge as it could be monitored for changes to its steady state over time.
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.