Design Con 2015
Breaking News
News & Analysis

China startup rolls 'unified' Android processor

6/8/2011 09:47 PM EDT
33 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: China startup rolls 'unified' Android processor
KB3001   6/11/2011 10:53:16 PM
NO RATINGS
That, and also the business model of this new start-up. Would they adopt the ARM soft IP model? It does not look like it, in which case they have a mountain to climb.

jaybus0
User Rank
CEO
re: China startup rolls 'unified' Android processor
jaybus0   6/11/2011 11:58:39 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm confused. Why is everyone calling it a "faster, better, cheaper, lower power" processor at this stage? What evidence is there that any of the above is true?

wave.forest
User Rank
Manager
re: China startup rolls 'unified' Android processor
wave.forest   6/11/2011 11:36:54 AM
NO RATINGS
Good luck to ICube. I reckon its success chiefly depends on how they can sell the architecture to some big Chinese telecom OEM's, like Huawei and ZTE. If they can make it as a "State will", it definitely will succeed. Remember TD-CDMA and TD-LTE? All the major telecom OEM's are licking their ass.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: China startup rolls 'unified' Android processor
Peter Clarke   6/10/2011 3:07:22 PM
NO RATINGS
They could but I believe they are going to offer their own C/C++ and graphics compilers

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: China startup rolls 'unified' Android processor
Peter Clarke   6/10/2011 3:06:31 PM
NO RATINGS
This CPU is "independent" so not an ARM ISA, it is claimed.

KarlS
User Rank
Rookie
re: China startup rolls 'unified' Android processor
KarlS   6/10/2011 1:22:00 PM
NO RATINGS
It may not be necessary to even use the byte code -- parse the source then design hardware that evaluates the if clauses and does the appropriate assignments. I have done it for C statements. Also, using the byte code pretty much is done by a JIT compiler at run time so why can't they write a new JIT for their architecture and use existing compilers?

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: China startup rolls 'unified' Android processor
Peter Clarke   6/10/2011 11:51:41 AM
NO RATINGS
@jelvidge As mentioned above, a more detailed article is slated for the next edition of EE Times Confidential.

Les_Slater
User Rank
CEO
re: China startup rolls 'unified' Android processor
Les_Slater   6/10/2011 9:19:55 AM
NO RATINGS
I don't think marketing is such a serious issue here. The primary issue is the competency of the team behind this project and the supporting infrastructure available to them in China. I said earlier however that economic and political issues were part of the equation. In that respect it might be worthwhile reviewing Andy Grove's take on the subject: http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/20100701_howtomakeanamericanjob_bloombergopinion.pdf

abraxalito
User Rank
Rookie
re: China startup rolls 'unified' Android processor
abraxalito   6/10/2011 9:00:39 AM
NO RATINGS
Not only that, but because existing architectures are indeed well established they need to show a compelling benefit to dislodge them. A few tens of percentage points will not suffice. Grove's Law would postulate they'd need around 10-fold improvement to disrupt the incumbents.

jelvidge
User Rank
Rookie
re: China startup rolls 'unified' Android processor
jelvidge   6/10/2011 7:15:27 AM
NO RATINGS
"ICube claims ... power-efficiency and cost-efficiency advantages over the established architectures". This is easy to claim but requires data to substantiate. I will, as the saying goes, believe it when I see it. (And I don't just mean the PowerPoint!)

Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week