SAN FRANCISCO—Citing concerns that Intel Corp. could offer a third quarter sales target that falls below its historical seasonal pattern, a Wall Street analyst Thursday (June 16) downgraded his firm’s rating on Intel stock from “outperform” to “market perform,” equivalent to a rating of “hold.”
Meanwhile, the analyst—Craig Berger of FBR Capital Markets—upgraded FBR’s rating on Intel rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) from “market perform” to “outperform,” equivalent to “buy.”
Berger wrote in a report circulated Thursday that Intel’s shares have solidly outperformed the Philadelphia Stock Exchange’s SOX semiconductor index since reporting its first quarter numbers, but said a 20 percent share price upside should be more easily achieved owned AMD than Intel. Intel’s stock traded near $21.41 in mid-day trading Thursday, down slightly from Wednesday’s close.
“We are not negative on Intel near $22, we just want to limit exposure to PC chip stocks, while recognizing the potential for more earnings growth with AMD in 2H11,” Berger wrote. Intel’s shares “have herculean difficulties breaking out above $24,” Berger added.
FBR analysts think that Intel’s second quarter results are tracking solidly, but the firm is concerned that the company’s third quarter sales target could come in below seasonal norms because a boost in second quarter sales driven by Intel’s Sandy Bridge processor could make increasing sales in the third quarter more difficult, Berger wrote. Intel is set to report second quarter results July 20, when the company is also expected to provide its third quarter sales target.
Meanwhile, checks with OEMS following the Computex computer show suggest that AMD could pick up some market share in microprocessors with Hewlett-Packard Co., Acer Inc. and Dell Inc., Berger said.
Intel’s sales in the third and fourth quarters are also likely to be hurt by the expected transition of Apple’s iPhone from Intel’s legacy Infineon Technologies AG 4GS basebands to chips made by Qualcomm, as has been reported, Berger said. This would mean a 1 percent hit to Intel’s annual sales, he said.
Saying that FBR analysts still feel that Intel’s stock is likely to trade at between $19 and $25 in 2011, Berger lowered the firm’s target price for Intel’s stock to $26 from $27. Berger raised his target for AMD’s stock price to $12 from $10.
It will have to remain an enigmatic parable for the time being.
There's content enough to puzzle over - seeing where the pieces fit, arrayed upon the field of players will provide an answer - but only to the persistent challenger...,
Alms for the man's effort.
Not the greatest timing for such a call.
Putting my ear to the track I can hear an announcement coming, a large announcement, an announcement long in the making, an announcement that will repair past humiliations...,
With all respect to Mr. Berger, he did go to a good school, his conclusion that AMD will gain 3 to 5 points of market share is nuts. Anytime Intel decides, AMD loses market share. He did work at Intel....? Should know that.
AMD's early benchmarks on Bulldozer are more like "lawn mower" and Sandy Bridge is, and will remain, in a compelling price/performance/watt position. AMD is hoping we all want eight cores, what they will do for you is still a mystical question. Not replicating the FPU on each core was innovative.
I disagree with Craig's review. I wouldn't buy Intel stock because Apple is changing the PC landscape (with the iPad) and Intel has not responded appropriately - yet, but hell no, not AMD!
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.