Breaking News
News & Analysis

Analyst: low yield drove Globalfoundries change

6/21/2011 11:28 AM EDT
7 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
re: Analyst: low yield drove Globalfoundries change
docdivakar   6/24/2011 12:48:41 AM
NO RATINGS
@peter.clarke: some heads roll at GF so it is natural every one wants to know the inside scoop. Daniel Nenni had the guessing game (TSMC's yield at 28nm) for a while on Semiconductor Professionals @LinkedIn. I don't remember the final consensus (correlated?) yield figure but it was no where north of 90%. According to this other post also by Nenni, it would seem quite difficult to get yields above 80% as one goes to 32/28nm nodes: http://dnenni.wordpress.com/2009/09/20/tsmc-restrictive-design-rules-and-3228nm-yield/ In addition to the continuing statistical effects, it appears proximity and stress effects are more pronounced as the nodes are shrunk. MP Divakar

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Analyst: low yield drove Globalfoundries change
Peter Clarke   6/22/2011 12:07:56 PM
NO RATINGS
What I have got, you have got. If anyone else is able to share yield numbers, it would be interesting!!!!

paul.delamusica
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analyst: low yield drove Globalfoundries change
paul.delamusica   6/21/2011 6:39:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Any details?

Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll