PORTLAND, Ore.— Armed with a new deal to integrate its MEMS sensor algorithms into Texas Instruments Inc.'s ZigBee-based radio frequency for consumer electronics (RF4CE) hardware platform—RemoTI—Hillcrest Laboratories Inc. hopes to penetrate further into the fast growing markets for MEMS-based motion-control interfaces for Smart TV, streaming video, motion-based gaming and 3-D gesture control.
"Our Freespace MotionEngine improves the performance of original equipment manufacturers' devices by squeezing every bit of functionality from MEMS-based user interfaces," said Chad Lucien, Hillcrest senior vice president of sales and marketing. "Now OEMs can choose TI's chips for RF4CE remotes as well as Broadcom for Bluetooth-based remotes, which we hope will significantly increase our design-ins to smart TVs, set-top boxes, gaming consoles and other gesture-based user interfaces."
Last year, Hillcrest Labs (Rockville, Md.) announced the integration of its MEMS sensor algorithms—the Freespace MotionEngine—with Broadcom Corp.'s digital-TV on-a-chip and Bluetooth on-a-chip, as well as major design-wins with the LG's Smart TVs, SMK's Smart TV remotes, and most recently for the second-generation of the popular Roku set-top box for Internet protocol television (IPTV). The company also licensed its intellectual property to Playstation-maker, Sony Corop. and "amicably resolved" a dispute with Wii-maker Nintendo Corp. regarding its motion-processing algorithms.
The latest incarnation of the Freespace MotionEngine has also improved its modularity, enabling OEMs to run its motion-processing algorithms inside the remote control itself, in the USB dongle that wirelessly communicates with the remote, or on the application processor inside the Smart TV, gaming console, mobile phone or other device.
"As we gain more design wins for a greater variety of devices, we needed to make the Freespace MotionEngine more flexible," said Lucien. "For instance, now Smart TVs can run the gesture recognition algorithms on their own application processor, thus cost-reducing and extending the battery life of their remotes, which now just have to transmit raw sensor data from the MEMS chips."
Hillcrest is also offering pre-assembled sensor modules complete with MEMS accelerometers, gyroscopes and magnetometers, plus a microcontroller running the Freespace MotionEngine, for easy integration into their own gesture-based remotes. Or OEMs can choose to license its Scoop Pointer, which is a complete reference design for gesture-based remote controls. The Scoop Pointer even includes a red-laser pointer so it can also be used for air-mouse applications where presenters choose menu items on-screen as well as to point out items with the laser pointer.
Hillcrest also recently updated its free Kylo web browser to allow OEMs to modify it when creating smart-remote control applications using the Freespace MotionEngine with computers.
@MP Divakar: Thanks for your comment! We at Hillcrest agree that in some applications it is most effective to include the fusion algorithms in the remote control. Our Freespace® MotionEngine™ software is modular so you can implement full processing on the remote or just sensor management on the remote with fusion, calibration, etc on the host (e.g. TV SoC). If full motion performance with the lowest power and cost is desired, then more processing on the host is generally a great solution. In the end though, the optimal choice depends on the particular application and customer design objectives.
@R. Colin Johnson: interesting article... Lucien's statement that "...have to transmit raw sensor data from the MEMS chips" passes the burden (not to mention process steps such as filtering and amplifying received signals) to the processors in the TV! I thought the most efficient use of gesture control data (accelerometer & gyro outputs) was thru fusion at the sensor interface itself.
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.