Breaking News
News & Analysis

CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS

9/16/2011 03:49 PM EDT
11 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Barry.Pangrle_#1
User Rank
Rookie
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
Barry.Pangrle_#1   9/29/2011 11:33:50 PM
NO RATINGS
From the source below, 2017-2019 for 7 nm seems pretty close to my previous comment's 2018 timeline. Again, what were the reasons for pushing 7 nm out to 2024? http://www.electroiq.com/blogs/electroiq_blog/2011/09/the-first-450mm-clubhouse.html "And note that a 2015 450mm pilot line coincides with what is expected to be the 10nm node at leading edge, and 2017-2019 could be 7nm or even 5nm."

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
wilber_xbox   9/25/2011 1:11:26 PM
NO RATINGS
I will go with the extension of the CMOS such as nanowire rather than completely different carbon based devices due to ease of integration with the current technology unless proven otherwise.

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
CEO
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
prabhakar_deosthali   9/25/2011 11:56:43 AM
NO RATINGS
what is the vision for the associated process and test equipment availability for something with geometry of less than 7nm.

seaEE
User Rank
CEO
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
seaEE   9/21/2011 2:48:08 AM
NO RATINGS
At some point we may find out whether Moore's law is process dependent, or if it is an equation that describes the capabilities of human endeavor.

Barry.Pangrle_#1
User Rank
Rookie
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
Barry.Pangrle_#1   9/21/2011 1:43:50 AM
NO RATINGS
If Intel is shipping 22 nm in 2012 and on pace to deliver 14 nm in 2014, at that pace it would be 10 nm in 2016 and 7 nm in 2018. Is there some reason to believe that suddenly the pace is going to fall off dramatically between now and 2018?

JMUNN
User Rank
Rookie
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
JMUNN   9/19/2011 7:25:18 PM
NO RATINGS
It sounds like we are at a realm where microbes and enzymes could do the heavy lifting instead of bulk processes like diffusion and ion implantation.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
resistion   9/19/2011 1:53:30 AM
NO RATINGS
2024 is not 7 nm, it should be ~ 2 nm or several graphene lattice constants. 7 nm is already ~28 graphene lattice constants.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
resistion   9/19/2011 1:28:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Graphene doesn't have much of a bandgap. Until it does, it won't replace any semiconductors.

skal_jp
User Rank
Rookie
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
skal_jp   9/18/2011 11:41:51 PM
NO RATINGS
It will be interesting to see the impact on design flows. I think digital won't change that much (will graphene use GDS?), but as for analog flow it might be different. Will good old Spice stay in line? The period with CMOS and graphene (or any other successor) co-existing might be tricky. How about mixed technology, like it was for bipolar and CMOS?

GREAT-Terry
User Rank
CEO
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
GREAT-Terry   9/17/2011 7:57:02 AM
NO RATINGS
2024 is not very far away from now! If graphene is going to be the next technology in electronics, we need to start more education now. At least engineering students have to learn more about this new material to be well prepare for the next generation electronics!

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.