Breaking News
News & Analysis

Rambus weighs appeal of antitrust defeat

11/16/2011 08:37 PM EST
8 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
GoViking
User Rank
Rookie
re: Rambus weighs appeal of antitrust defeat
GoViking   11/17/2011 7:41:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Rambus has way more engineers than lawyers, even if you count outside counsel they used n this case. They have hundreds of self-developed patents, recognition for which you can see on the plaques lining the walls of their offices. It cost them tens of millions of dollars to develop these technologies. ige . whichn

GoViking
User Rank
Rookie
re: Rambus weighs appeal of antitrust defeat
GoViking   11/17/2011 7:38:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Rambus did not ever control the price of RDRAMs incorporating its technology. Only the makers of RDRAMs set pricing. You should complain to Samsung or Elpida, who controlled the market for RDRAM.

R. Mark Clayton
User Rank
Rookie
re: Rambus weighs appeal of antitrust defeat
R. Mark Clayton   11/17/2011 4:59:28 PM
NO RATINGS
A jury and a three month trial - no wonder the wheels of US justice grind exceedingly slowly. I am getting sick fed up of the likes of Apple seeking injunction because [gosh!] another makers product has a rectangular screen or other basoc or obvious feature. Of course when the boot was on the other foot the Beatles had to take them back to court again and again for selling music using their trade mark.

pmoyle
User Rank
Rookie
re: Rambus weighs appeal of antitrust defeat
pmoyle   11/17/2011 2:37:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Ha ha, ha ha, I love it when lawyers lose. (Rambus firm is basically nothing but lawyers).

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Rambus weighs appeal of antitrust defeat
goafrit   11/17/2011 12:53:41 AM
NO RATINGS
Interesting how this company stock crashed. If they have another day like this, they could be history.

dcwang154
User Rank
Rookie
re: Rambus weighs appeal of antitrust defeat
dcwang154   11/17/2011 12:45:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Rambus is more than a patent troll. Its predator behavior is clearly shown at standards body by not disclosing IP. I hope all jury has the same courage to stop all patent trolls.

SylvieBarak
User Rank
Rookie
re: Rambus weighs appeal of antitrust defeat
SylvieBarak   11/16/2011 11:41:55 PM
NO RATINGS
RAMBUS lost a $4B lawsuit and their stock dropped 60%. That's all the proof you need that the firm was simply a patent troll... RDRAM was ridiculously expensive and never reduced its price, even when the rest of the market did. It's exactly that kind of arrogance that spelled the company's downfall.

HankWalker
User Rank
Manager
re: Rambus weighs appeal of antitrust defeat
HankWalker   11/16/2011 10:58:46 PM
NO RATINGS
To claim that RDRAM failed in the marketplace due to high prices ignores its fundamental technical flaws. RDRAM memory is designed for high bandwidth and many outstanding memory requests (with each chip forming a separate memory bank), but at the cost of a significant increase in latency due to the bus snaking through tie RIMMs. It performed well for scientific and graphics workloads that can support multiple outstanding memory requests, but poorly for integer workloads that typically can only support a few outstanding memory requests. The bus design led to higher power dissipation, and more challenging circuit design and fabrication, and larger die size. Recall how Intel had to give up on a three-RIMM channel. RDRAM should have stayed focused on graphics applications that can best leverage its features.

Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week