Breaking News
News & Analysis

Imagination backs Toumaz wireless IC spinout

1/3/2012 05:51 PM EST
6 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Imagination backs Toumaz wireless IC spinout
krisi   1/3/2012 6:49:23 PM
NO RATINGS
$7.8 sounds like a great investment for relatively small firm, good for Toumaz! ...anyone knows their revenue? Kris

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
re: Imagination backs Toumaz wireless IC spinout
docdivakar   1/3/2012 10:55:08 PM
NO RATINGS
I am not sure what the niche is from Toumaz in the already crowded wireless communication IC space. The sensor network space including solutions for 802.15.6 has seen a healthy number of companies developing products. MP Divakar

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
re: Imagination backs Toumaz wireless IC spinout
Peter Clarke   1/4/2012 10:04:51 AM
NO RATINGS
Toumaz has done work on operating transistors at below the process threshold voltage which provides advantages for low power in their WSN and body-worn medical type applications.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Imagination backs Toumaz wireless IC spinout
krisi   1/3/2012 11:21:30 PM
NO RATINGS
As far as I understand wireless technology that Toumaz has developed is much lower in power than many competing technologies (Bluetooth, ZigBee, etc)...perhaps we can get someone from Toumaz to comment? Kris

eewiz
User Rank
Author
re: Imagination backs Toumaz wireless IC spinout
eewiz   1/4/2012 5:39:39 AM
NO RATINGS
@ Kris 7.8m for 25% stake is not so great. Many web companies in series A fetches much more than that . If I am not wrong the wireless tech is the key USP of Toumaz healthcare products, which adds to the disappointment.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Imagination backs Toumaz wireless IC spinout
krisi   1/4/2012 5:53:59 AM
NO RATINGS
To @eewiz: In the good, old days of Internet bubble $30M valuation would be small...but in today's market that is not bad...having said that I don't know what their revenue is and projected earnings going forward...Kris

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed