SAN FRANCISCO--Intel Corp. has been pushing the concept of “Ultrabook” PCs for almost a year, but to date, only four PC OEMs have introduced the thinner, lighter, sleeker notebooks to market.
Several more have announced future devices based on Intel’s reference design, but whether the devices will succeed in the market is still a hotly debated subject.
“The current Ultrabooks are nothing more than a slim and light-weight notebook, or should I say MacBook Air clones with a Windows operating system,” said In-Stat analyst Jim McGregor, claiming that the platform is far from revolutionary.
Instant-on capabilities, touch screens, new security features, all-day battery life and many other sleek features are mostly tied to the release of Windows 8 later next year, said McGregor, adding that this would also depend on Microsoft sticking to its schedule.
Intel, however, claims that while Windows 8 enables a good touch experience, it has very little to do with the near-term success of Ultrabooks and says it has over 60 design wins lined up for Ivy Bridge already that are not dependent on the operating system.
While some Ultrabook features may be new to traditional notebook models, McGregor said they are simply “evolutionary trends” already set in motion by other mobile devices like smartphones and tablets.
Ultabooks, he said, were simply further blurring the line between PCs and tablets, especially with the rise in popularity of detachable keyboards and the expectation of the Windows 8 operating system.
“The main difference between the tablet and Ultrabook platform will be software, consumer usage models, and/or purchasing and business models,” said McGregor, pointing out that while Intel drove the trademarked Ultrabook brand, it was nothing more than a rebrand of its previous ultra-thin branding exercise.
Taking his argument a step further, McGregor posits that the Ultrabook brand is simply not important to consumers.
“The concept of the slim notebook is just an evolution in mobile computing that is long overdue. The entire PC ecosystem has a history of trying to charge more for smaller devices rather than viewing the trend as a path to further growth,” he said.
Current economic circumstances and increased competition, however, have led the PC ecosystem to view the born-again Ultrabooks as a potential lifesaver.
“While the term lifesaver may seem rather extreme, it is fitting,” said McGregor, positing that the PC industry is feeling the crunch after losing its position as a magnet platform for applications, more critical in the minds of contemporary consumers.
Sources close to Intel have rejected McGregor's claims, however, noting that Ultrabooks don’t compete with tablets – that it is just netbooks that compete with tablets.
Thinner, lighter, better battery life, instant on/off - these are what it's about. I hear many high end smartphone users complaining about battery life - most users do not think about tech limits until the word goes around or they see it themselves. Spread the word. :)
Really, a "Samsung SoC"?. Samsung is the foundry for the A4, the design and the IP is Apple's.
I guess every fabless semiconductor company is just printing their name on a "TSMC SoC" or a "UMC SoC" or Global Foundries, etc.
Ultrabooks are what customers have been wanting for several years now - the fact that they've finally come to the party is a sign that Intel is now beginning to feel the pinch from ARM. Too little, too late for the PC though. If they'd not dragged their feet then the PC would still have more years to live, but Intel has hastened its demise with its own complacency.
Add great speech and command recognition in noisy environment, and eliminate the keyword. Run software abstraction layer so I can run window and Android apps.
Don't call it a Ultra PC or a tablet, call it a 'Personal Assistant' to the World of information
Apple caters to the 1 % wannabes and continues to wrack up large margins by manipulating them here as well as by using "slave" labor in China via Foxconn etc to assemble the i - whatevers.
Apple represents the worst hypocrisy of the Baby Boomer generation that grew up dealing drugs and then became Lawyers or MBAs.
Jobs represented the nadir of this hypocrisy - a hyper - capitalist with pseudo " Buddhist " pretensions.
The smartest thing that dropout Jobs ever did was to glom on to Steve Wozniak and market the Apple I built by Woz. That made the biggest difference to Jobs life.
The concept of Ultrabook reminds me APS camera with 28mm film cartridge. APS was indeed good camera - sleek, light and compact, easy to use, compare to 35mm film camera. However APS camera market did not really take off. People just hate to pay for film and DPE service, no matter how APS was good as film camera.
I have no doubt Ultrabook will be good PC, but will PC could be good product for upcoming years? People just hate to deal with all those PC problem - configuration, compatibility, virus / malware, software update etc. Even though those issues are fundamentally remains for Smartpad / Smartphone too, impression for general people is Smartpad / Smartphone is much easier to deal than PC.
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.