Breaking News
News & Analysis

Windows on ARM will not be terribly successful says analyst

1/15/2012 05:56 AM EST
26 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Windows on ARM will not be terribly successful says analyst
t.alex   1/21/2012 7:28:13 AM
NO RATINGS
That is a bad approach still.

selinz
User Rank
CEO
re: Windows on ARM will not be terribly successful says analyst
selinz   1/20/2012 11:23:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Time will tell. if worldwide windows phones reach even 10%, I think that'll be a major victory.. That's still a lot of phones.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Windows on ARM will not be terribly successful says analyst
KB3001   1/20/2012 11:01:58 PM
NO RATINGS
I am not sure it's just a matter of changing their recipe and optimize for power. It ain't that simple. To do this, they have to depart from their core x86 belief, which they do not seem to want to do.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Windows on ARM will not be terribly successful says analyst
KB3001   1/20/2012 10:59:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Of course! it's just a matter of time...

jeffreyrdiamond
User Rank
Rookie
re: Windows on ARM will not be terribly successful says analyst
jeffreyrdiamond   1/20/2012 9:21:57 PM
NO RATINGS
What about all the XP apps that failed to run in Vista and then Windows 7? Some people never left XP. Others bailed on Windows completely. But those who remained, those running Windows 7, about 1/3 the PC market, by self selection are not so attached to legacy code.

MarkFromNJ
User Rank
Rookie
re: Windows on ARM will not be terribly successful says analyst
MarkFromNJ   1/18/2012 9:08:32 PM
NO RATINGS
I think Windows is, and for some time has been, irrelevant. It's only market advantage is the stable of software and that runs only on Intel. Vendors will not rewrite anything but the most profitable apps (Adobe, MS Office) for ARM because it costs too much and is more a rewrite than a recompile. Look how long it took vendors to support iA64 (64 bit Windows). That was a trivial change compared to Intel vs Arm.

MarkFromNJ
User Rank
Rookie
re: Windows on ARM will not be terribly successful says analyst
MarkFromNJ   1/18/2012 8:58:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Maybe not. Another artice in this issue had a talking head from Intel who claimed their past preference for computing power over power efficiency was simply that, a choice. That makes sense given that, in the PC market, you could only sell your CPUs for $1000 each ("Extreme" version) if it was faster than everyone elses CPU. Now they just need to change the recipe and optimize for power consumption. Intel's foundries are at least one geometry node ahead of the ARM guys (ie TSMC). Each node increases efficiency considerably. So they ought to be able to make a better performing part at equal or even lower power.

xorbit
User Rank
Rookie
re: Windows on ARM will not be terribly successful says analyst
xorbit   1/18/2012 7:57:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Windows on ARM is irrelevant. The only thing that keeps Windows relevant these days is a legacy of x86 software. Lacking support for these legacy apps, Windows on ARM is pointless.

Arnold E
User Rank
Rookie
re: Windows on ARM will not be terribly successful says analyst
Arnold E   1/18/2012 3:58:21 AM
NO RATINGS
"it will be interesting to see how well it runs,” said Gold, ...people would take note if Android ran better on the Atom platform than it currently runs on ARM, adding, “there is a chance that will happen.” What makes anyone believe that it will perform 'noticebly' better? Yes there is a 'chance' but more likely it won't be noticeable.

eembedded_janitor
User Rank
Rookie
re: Windows on ARM will not be terribly successful says analyst
eembedded_janitor   1/18/2012 2:52:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Possibly, but not absolutely necessary. It is possible to run x86 compiled software on an x86 emulator. However that would be a lot slower and require more power.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll