SAN FRANCISCO – Samsung gave an early peek at its first quad-core mobile application processor at the International Solid-State Circuits Conference here. The unannounced chip is Samsung’s first to use its 32 nm high-k metal gate process and sports advances in performance and battery life over its existing 45 nm Exynos chips.
The new chip comes in versions using two or four ARM Cortex A9 cores running at rates from 200 MHz to 1.5 GHz along with a 64-bit ARM Neon media processing block. The cores share a 1 Mbyte L2 cache with a snoop control unit. The chip does not include an integrated baseband.
Samsung is using the latest version of its own graphics unit for the chip. It includes four pixel processors and one geometry engine with a dedicated 128 KByte L2 cache. The graphics support the OpenGL ES 2.0 API and can generate up to 57 Mpolygons/s.
The chip supports two LPDDR2 or DDR3 interfaces running up to 400 MHz for a total memory bandwidth of up to 6.4 Gbytes/s.
Thanks both to the 32 nm process and a handful of power and thermal management techniques, the chip can deliver up to 26 percent more performance overall than Samsung’s current Exynos chip made in a 45 nm polysilicon process. It also can deliver improvements in battery life ranging from 34 to 50 percent, depending on the application.
Samsung said the new chip delivers up to 26.3 percent improvements in video frame rates. In a demo, Samsung showed the chip using 48 percent less power on 3-D calculations and 45 percent less power in CPU jobs than the 45 nm chip.
The Samsung 32 nm HKMG process keep transistor and gate leakage nearly to the levels of the company’s 45 nm polysilicon process, much lower than expected for 32 nm polysilicon technology. Samsung tuned the process to a sweet spot somewhere between its potential for delivering 40 percent more performance or a tenth the leakage, said Se-Hyung Yang, a principal engineer for SoC development at Samsung Electronics who presented the paper.
The chip has four independent power domains and several power sub-domains. Each ARM core and up to a half of the cache memory can be turned off or on independently. A set of media accelerator blocks are similarly power gated independently.
The chip dynamically uses either forward or reverse body-biasing on n-wells to improve performance or reduce leakage as needed. It also uses thermal monitors and a thermal management unit to trigger power management actions including shutting down blocks as needed to protect devices from over-heating and keep a handset below a fixed surface temperature set by handset makers.
“Recently power consumption for mobile devices have increased a lot and mobile devices have limited cooling capability,” said Yang, underlining a growing problem in smartphone design.
Samsung optimized its 45 nm processor for performance first and later found it could not get its full performance without exceeding power consumption limits. The 32 nm chip was optimized first for power consumption, said Yang.
Samsung will formally announce the product soon, said Yang, presumably at next week’s Mobile World Congress. Nvidia grabbed the lead in rolling out a quad-core mobile chip last year.
Samsung is the only company with both logic and memory process, quite scary, actually. Not to mention consumer products. One-stop shop with government support is too much momentum for rest of the world.
The 45nm dual core A9 Exynos 4210 uses Mali-400MP4. The previous generation chip used PowerVr540 (chip that was recently renamed Exynos 3110). Given that Samsung last year licensed multi-core PowerVr series 5, and apparently has "access to" Mali T604 and Mali T658, it seems at odds they would rework their own inhouse graphics that were last seen in single core A8,S5PC100. I still suspect the presenter chose his words poorly.
"Samsung is using the latest version of its own graphics unit for the chip."
Did you mean they are using Arm's own graphics unit? Given the description is 4 pixel processors and 1 vertex processor, it sounds very much like the Mali400MP4 as used in the Exynos 4210/4212.
If as mentioned it is based on A9 then it sould still be for the upper end mobile handset rather than tablet. The power saving achieved is quite good but the comparison is only over its earlier devices and Samsung handhelds are not known for long battery times.