Breaking News
News & Analysis

Intel, AMD pull out of WSTS

2/28/2012 09:56 PM EST
15 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, AMD pull out of WSTS
junko.yoshida   2/29/2012 6:06:44 PM
NO RATINGS
I just posted an opinion piece on this topic. "Why it's wrong for Intel and AMD to abandon WSTS" You can read it here: http://www.eetimes.com/discussion/other/4237256/Why-it-s-wrong-for-Intel-and-AMD-to-abandon-WSTS

Dave.Dykstra
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, AMD pull out of WSTS
Dave.Dykstra   2/29/2012 5:57:32 PM
NO RATINGS
While this will make data collecting somewhat more difficult on a monthly basis, earnings reports and guidance will still likely be provided by Intel and AMD on a regular basis, so much of the data will still be there (although probably not in the format that the WSTS would like).

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, AMD pull out of WSTS
junko.yoshida   2/29/2012 12:33:21 PM
NO RATINGS
We have been trying to gather comments from the industry on this issue. While industry officials try to downplay the significance of the news, this is an incredibly short-sighted move on the part of Intel. The industry, when its stops collecting data of its own market, will start losing its power. It starts losing its own voice -- against whatever unforeseeable battles/issues the industry would need to fight collectively. Tell us your thoughts.

Kinnar
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, AMD pull out of WSTS
Kinnar   2/29/2012 12:16:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Since the two giants have left the consortium WSTS will have to revamp the mission statement from start. As it will no longer be able to provide statistics for PC processors.

kdboyce
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, AMD pull out of WSTS
kdboyce   2/28/2012 10:59:28 PM
NO RATINGS
The WSTS data is useful for Market Share information provided you are comparing apples to apples AND you know the real sales numbers per category and companies participating. Some companies, even public ones, are not comfortable sharing much detail on their sales let alone a breakout of those sales by product category. I prefer to know my market share by looking at how my design wins are increasing against my peer competition, and how that translates into increasing revenues. Do I know the exact number? NO... but I do know it is increasing. The responsibilities of the company organization is to continue that trend as long as possible by providing true value to customers with their product offerings and solutions and support.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed