Design Con 2015
Breaking News
News & Analysis

U.S. levies low tariffs on China solar panels

3/20/2012 07:12 PM EDT
11 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: U.S. levies low tariffs on China solar panels
DrQuine   3/25/2012 2:31:57 AM
NO RATINGS
All new products are sold below cost until their development and marketing costs are paid off. Even if we look only at the incremental costs associated with each individual sale item, how does the law balance accusations of "selling below cost" against building market share in anticipation of gaining economies of scale when sales volumes grow?

selinz
User Rank
Manager
re: U.S. levies low tariffs on China solar panels
selinz   3/24/2012 1:19:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Most people in the US want to buy stuff cheap but get paid lots of money to do it. Why wouldn't we? However, someone has to pay in the long term. I'm curious to see the effect that this tariff has on a market with dubious economic necessity.

microe
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. levies low tariffs on China solar panels
microe   3/23/2012 8:19:46 PM
NO RATINGS
if the companies are not competitive, just let them fail. Consumers benefit from competition. Whatever tariff will be eventually paid by consumers.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
re: U.S. levies low tariffs on China solar panels
wilber_xbox   3/23/2012 2:02:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Lower tariffs usually promote competition in the business but in case of solar this only mean the total annihilation of the local industry as most of this industry runs on the government support.

microe
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. levies low tariffs on China solar panels
microe   3/22/2012 9:44:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Japanese government should definitely put high tariff on imported US cars given their heavy government subsidization; China should put high tariff on all imported US soybeans for the same reason... why those governments/politicians advocated free market for decades are now doing the opposite?

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: U.S. levies low tariffs on China solar panels
chanj0   3/21/2012 7:05:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Crystalline photovoltaic isn't new technology. The efficiency of the panel is not high enough. I believe US shall focus their energy in creating new and more promising renewable energy. The tariff may help US government subsidizing company which has created a more promising technology.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. levies low tariffs on China solar panels
rick merritt   3/21/2012 6:09:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Panel makers at the PC America show here were generally all showing crystalline modules and were pretty frank that there were no major tech differences between them. It's a price game.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
re: U.S. levies low tariffs on China solar panels
elctrnx_lyf   3/21/2012 6:29:34 AM
NO RATINGS
This seems like a very temporary solution to the problem of solar panel makers of the US.

Dave.Dykstra
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. levies low tariffs on China solar panels
Dave.Dykstra   3/21/2012 1:12:36 AM
NO RATINGS
A very sensitive area on both sides with some interesting comments above. Hopefully, we can do whatever it takes to get the industry moving on its own without the need for government intervention on either side. It would be nice to see the free market given a chance to work for a change, although it certainly appears too late in this industry, and would require a great deal of restraint on the part of all governments since that would not be a one-sided arrangement.

george.leopold
User Rank
Rookie
re: U.S. levies low tariffs on China solar panels
george.leopold   3/21/2012 1:04:10 AM
NO RATINGS
The wages of Chinese workers toiling in the technology sectors are slowly increasing, making it more expensive to manufacture products like solar cells and panels there. Still, massive government subsidies continue as does Beijing's unwillingness to let its currency float (so as to keep Chinese products cheap on global markets). The U.S. tariff move in an election year appears designed to suggest action against cheap Chinese imports while accomplishing very little. It's clear that the best way to compete with China is through innovation in areas like solar materials and manufacturing processes. A trade war hurts both nations, and the leaders of both China and the U.S. understand this.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
Sheetal.Pandey
 
Sheetal.Pandey
 
David Ashton
 
David Ashton
 
resistion
 
Charles.Desassure
 
Charles.Desassure
 
Charles.Desassure
 
David Ashton
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week