Breaking News
News & Analysis

No fab for Qualcomm but firm mulls business evolution

4/20/2012 02:37 PM EDT
3 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: No fab for Qualcomm but firm mulls business evolution
daleste   4/23/2012 2:41:30 AM
NO RATINGS
It is good to have your own fab so that you can control your supply, but the cost of a new fab today is enormous. Look at the companies trying to go to fabless or fab-lite. If you can't keep the fab full and keep it at the cutting edge, you will suffer the costs.

pkandel
User Rank
Rookie
re: No fab for Qualcomm but firm mulls business evolution
pkandel   4/22/2012 7:32:52 AM
NO RATINGS
Agreed--sounds like Mollenkopf is wedded to Qualcomm's fabless history. I loved the last line of the article, which questions the entire idea: "Mollenkopf did not indicate how this would help Qualcomm compete with companies such as Intel or provide the company with guaranteed supply volumes." This sounds like the journalistic equivalent of an accountant commenting that its client may have a "going concern" challenge... :)

PV-Geek
User Rank
Rookie
re: No fab for Qualcomm but firm mulls business evolution
PV-Geek   4/21/2012 1:01:20 AM
NO RATINGS
So I guess the new business model is to own your own fab without owning it? How much influence and how close to a foundry do you have to get until you can't tell the difference from owning it?

Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week