Breaking News
News & Analysis

Hanking starts building Chinese MEMS wafer fab

5/4/2012 08:59 AM EDT
5 comments
NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
D.Tomaszewski
User Rank
Author
re: Hanking starts building Chinese MEMS wafer fab
D.Tomaszewski   5/12/2012 7:26:21 AM
NO RATINGS
Similarly Keithley, Tektronix have been purchased by an investment fund. Finally, any commercial activity means money. Will businessmen decide of any aspect of our life ?

GREATTerry
User Rank
Author
re: Hanking starts building Chinese MEMS wafer fab
GREATTerry   5/7/2012 1:22:43 AM
NO RATINGS
MEMS fab seems a good idea and it can help the China to boost up the standard of local-branded sensors.

chipmonk0
User Rank
Author
re: Hanking starts building Chinese MEMS wafer fab
chipmonk0   5/4/2012 6:47:13 PM
NO RATINGS
About 25 years ago Nippon Mining & Sumitomo Metals ( both Japanese ) got into semiconductors. Sumitomo is one of the largest suppliers of raw Si wafers to Fabs. They even have a factory in the US. The Chinese are merely copying with assistance from US veterans ( as reported here like this Mr. Sparks, ex Delco ) made homeless by Wall St.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Hanking starts building Chinese MEMS wafer fab
krisi   5/4/2012 6:01:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Mining company getting into MEMs business? It could get very interesting...

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed