LONDON – China and the United States are the two countries most likely to come up with "disruptive technology breakthroughs" with a global impact in the next two to four years, according to a survey conducted by auditor and consultancy KPMG (Amstelveen, Netherlands).
Nearly one third of respondents (30 percent) said China will be the future "global hotspot for innovation," followed by the United States with 29 percent, India (13 percent), Japan (8 percent) and Korea (5 percent). The United Kingdom ranks 11th and was named by just 1 percent of respondents.
"More and more technology executives believe that when it comes to tech innovation the center of gravity is moving east. Until now China has been better known for its disruptive cost model rather than its disruptive technologies but things are beginning to change," said Tudor Aw, technology sector head for KPMG Europe LLP, in a statement.
The survey also showed that 43 percent of respondents said it is likely that the technology innovation center of the world will move from Silicon Valley to another country in the next four years. China was named as the country most likely to be the next innovation centre (45 percent), followed by India (21 percent) and Japan tied with Korea on 9 percent each.
The survey was conducted with 668 technology business executives between March 2012 and May 2012 with 34 percent of the respondents based in the Americas, 42 percent in Asia Pacific, and 23 percent in Europe, Middle East and Africa.
The survey revealed that the technology sector set to have the biggest business impact in four year's time is likely to be mobile devices named by 28 percent of respondents. Some 17 percent referenced cloud computing and storage and 13 percent advanced IT and 3-D technology.
The barriers to commercializing these technologies are thought to be security and privacy governance (30 percent), followed by funding and access to capital (24 percent) and technology complexity (24 percent).
Another snippet from the survey was that the respondents considered the top approach to motivating innovation amongst employees was to provide financial incentives (39 percent).
Innovation will happen where the money is. Also, the production will happen where people/government are ready to invest the billions of dollars needed.
Both look grim for the moment in europe. Don't really see any company in the EU with the resources to build the 450 mm wafer fabs that's coming in the next ten years or so.
I'm not afraid that we'll stop producing good scientific results. IMEC, Fraunhofer and the rest of the institutes are world class enough for that. I'm afraid that we will continue developing stuff that is either bought up by american companies before take-off or commercialized in Asia instead.
One reason that europe lags behind is that we in a way are too close to the US culturally and economically. People with good ideas go from europe to silicon valley or are pretty ready to sell their companies to the more established american ones. Sometimes it feels like europe is the equivalent of farm teams in the NHL. Create talent that's later used by other teams.
China certainly has a lot of forward momemntum going for it right now and the results of the survey are surprising. Back in 1985 we heard the same about Japan ( anyone remember all the hoopla about "Fifth Generation Computing" ) till they went soft ( a lack of enough Mathematicians and PhDs in general ) and the Tokyo land bubble sucked oxygen out of them. China is still a Command Economy with its impact seen most in Academia and R&D. Great for catching up with the Joneses but not fertile ground for innovation
Even when you add silk, hand-pulled noodles tea, ceramics, the abacus or ocean going junks ( of the Chen Ho type ) thats still not much for such a large & independent nation with such a long history ( 5,000 years !). Tiny Italy produced more ( by couple orders of magnitude ) innovations during just the 200 years of the Renaissance ( and no they did not have to wait for Marco Polo to bring back Pasta or Ice Cream from China - they had developed them on their own ). Recently there has been a concerted effort among the third-rate academics in the West ( seem to be concentrated particularly in the UK - with their tradition of toadying & fraud now exposed by the News of the World & Barclays scandals ) to give credit to the Chinese for inventing just about everything in order to curry favor with them. These need to be taken with a grain of salt.
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.