Breaking News
News & Analysis

Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech

Manufacturing, supply chain are key
7/11/2012 04:15 PM EDT
13 comments
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Adele.Hars
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
Adele.Hars   7/11/2012 10:04:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Indeed it was a great panel -- Chenming Hu of UC Berkeley and inventor of the FD-SOI technology was on it, too.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
goafrit   7/12/2012 12:23:54 AM
NO RATINGS
I hope this makes real progress. We need alternatives because if not contained, Intel will dominate the industry and set prices without fear of losing markets

Hillol
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
Hillol   7/12/2012 12:55:51 AM
NO RATINGS
agree

GroovyGeek
User Rank
CEO
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
GroovyGeek   7/12/2012 6:59:25 AM
NO RATINGS
And you think the IBM alliance is the answer? IBM lost relevance as a process technology pace-setter at least a decade ago. Mobile chips tend to have slim margins, and the substrates required for FD-SOI are expensive, adding the equivalent of at least one metal layer to the overall price of a chip. I can see why Soitec is pushing this, but I am not aware of a single demonstrated benefit of FD-SOI, and several well documented downsides (self-heating, floating body effects).

SiliconAsia
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
SiliconAsia   7/12/2012 3:47:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Agree, This article talks about FDSOI as if Intel never compared this to FinFet or any other process technology options. FDSOI or SOI in general was known to semiconductor for long and its benefits and downsides are well documented. In fact if you ruled out the price/cost factor of SOI, there are other technologies which can deliver much better performance/power than SOI.

Adele.Hars
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
Adele.Hars   7/12/2012 4:01:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Since posting this comment, it's been pointed out to me that many people (JP Colinge, D.Flandre, researchers at Hitachi and many more...) did seminal work on fully-depleted/thin body transistors leveraging SOI. We think of this as new, but the industry's been quietly working on this for over 25 years!

the_floating_ gate
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
the_floating_ gate   7/12/2012 5:12:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Of course Intel looked at SOI...and Bohr even agrees that some will use SOI but based on Intel's evaluation they rejected it. 4/16/2012 7:29 PM EDT Mark Bohr addresses SOI versus bulk One on One with M. Bohr http://semimd.com/blog/2011/07/14/one-on-one-with-mark-bohr/

the_floating_ gate
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
the_floating_ gate   7/12/2012 5:20:38 PM
NO RATINGS
"IBM lost relevance as a process technology pace-setter at least a decade ago." 10 years ago IBM screwed up big time pushing SOG (SiLK)in conjunction with copper interconnect. UMC licensed the technology from IBM but dropped it because they figured out SiLK was not working. And now gate first debacle - it's good for one node...

Stanley_
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
Stanley_   7/13/2012 2:15:38 PM
NO RATINGS
"While Intel’s FinFET approach is not expected to enter production until the chip giant rolls out its 14-nm process technology" Isn't it true that Ivy Bridge is using 22nm Tri-Gate, and already in market?

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
chanj0   7/14/2012 10:05:59 PM
NO RATINGS
A consortium for better mobile processor makes total sense. One of the many keys solution of reducing power consumption is by achieving complete integration. There may be more than 1 consortia formed due to competitive and political reasons. If it is acceptable to the industry, 1 is always better than multiple. Nonetheless, the industry and market will drive the direction. An interesting comment from Moore, "the current infrastructure works out to roughly one server to deliver content to 600 smartphones" I believe it depends on the kind of server and memory capacity. In addition, the type of services will affect the number of smartphones, or in general, mobile devices a server can deal with. To my experience, a dual Xeon with 128GB of memory shall be able to deal with thousands of simultaneous connections. If Moore is talking about ARM based servers, I have no doubt improvement is necessary.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.