Breaking News
News & Analysis

Court hears of Jobs’ penchant for secrecy

8/4/2012 05:04 AM EDT
8 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Court hears of Jobs’ penchant for secrecy
t.alex   8/9/2012 3:54:54 AM
NO RATINGS
If the jury only comprise technical people that is equally unfair. Some may be Apple developer for long time and their fascination for Apple products will have some effect in their decision.

GREAT-Terry
User Rank
CEO
re: Court hears of Jobs’ penchant for secrecy
GREAT-Terry   8/6/2012 5:38:37 AM
NO RATINGS
Interesting story. Although I think the lawsuit just waste the energy and money of the two companies, having read stories like this is kind of fun.

djardine
User Rank
Rookie
re: Court hears of Jobs’ penchant for secrecy
djardine   8/6/2012 12:42:28 AM
NO RATINGS
I wonder if Jobs envisioned this invasion of Apple's privacy when he declared patent war on Google and Samsung. I also wonder if this would have made him reconsider.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: Court hears of Jobs’ penchant for secrecy
DrQuine   8/5/2012 10:57:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Who would have ever guessed that we would learn about the development of an innovative technology through court proceedings and biographies? It is fascinating the variety of ways in which secret project details eventually become public.

chun wing
User Rank
Rookie
re: Court hears of Jobs’ penchant for secrecy
chun wing   8/5/2012 5:13:26 PM
NO RATINGS
I am not a fan of both Apple and Samsung, but I think the problems do not stemmed from these companies. I think it is the patent law that needs a thorough reform. (I believe Apple is also a victim as they lost a lawsuit to Creative's "ZEN" patent because of the user interface of the iPod) As an engineer, I found it surprising that in the US, the judges do not have engineering technical background for these patent lawsuits. And even more surprisingly (from my patent class I took few years ago) is that the jury CANNOT have technical background because one jury may have larger influence over the rest juries if one have a stronger technical background than the others. I think patent is still extremely important to protect the IPs and innovations. But I think a jury comprised of technical people in the field is more appropriate, so that these lawsuits will not be focusing on the shape of the devices but rather than the "real" infringement of innovations.

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Court hears of Jobs’ penchant for secrecy
t.alex   8/4/2012 1:39:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Amazing the teams at Apple.

Stanley_
User Rank
Rookie
re: Court hears of Jobs’ penchant for secrecy
Stanley_   8/4/2012 6:40:39 AM
NO RATINGS
working night and weekend sound like samsung...

Stanley_
User Rank
Rookie
re: Court hears of Jobs’ penchant for secrecy
Stanley_   8/4/2012 6:39:27 AM
NO RATINGS
hmm.. it seems apple had a small team like samsung...

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.