Breaking News
News & Analysis

Expert says Samsung phones, tablets infringe

8/6/2012 07:43 PM EDT
13 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: Expert says Samsung phones, tablets infringe
daleste   8/7/2012 12:49:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Maybe that is how Samsung got ahead of Apple in smart phone sales.

SiliconAsia
User Rank
Rookie
re: Expert says Samsung phones, tablets infringe
SiliconAsia   8/7/2012 2:23:00 AM
NO RATINGS
It's really SAD that the innovation Apple is trying to protect and prosecute is rectangular shape with rounded corners and a flat, black front surface. They called that design innovation! When did Americans become so dumb? Perhaps I am overstating things, but it seems that Americans are becoming dumber by the year. Where is real innovation, America?

HS_SemiPro
User Rank
CEO
re: Expert says Samsung phones, tablets infringe
HS_SemiPro   8/7/2012 3:00:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Where is innovation of Samsung?, If there product is really good,they do not need to copy apple appearance. But fact of the matter is Apple products are viewed as sign of prestige. And high end users prefer Apple products. I guess it is lack of risk taking & supporting innovators by Samsung. IF they spend enough human capital on design,they can come up with better design, but then again, copying is easier. That is why more and more US companies are not even sharing product specs,w/o NDA. coz some countries are just making the look alikes with same specs and selling it cheap.

GREAT-Terry
User Rank
CEO
re: Expert says Samsung phones, tablets infringe
GREAT-Terry   8/7/2012 4:24:12 AM
NO RATINGS
I think Samsung is not only copying on the shape but the whole human-machine interface is also the infringing. Maybe we have to say Android is also copying the ineterface of iOS.

SiliconAsia
User Rank
Rookie
re: Expert says Samsung phones, tablets infringe
SiliconAsia   8/7/2012 4:29:11 PM
NO RATINGS
So then you agree Apple iOS is also a copy of someone else's - Xerox Parc Operations Systems. There is no Apple OS without Steve visiting Xerox Parc to experience first GUI based workstation.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Expert says Samsung phones, tablets infringe
Bert22306   8/7/2012 6:14:37 PM
NO RATINGS
"But fact of the matter is Apple products are viewed as sign of prestige. And high end users prefer Apple products." As a previous poster commented, when did Americans become so dumb? Good question. So, those who think they are privileged for owning iPhones want to make sure no one else builds rectangular toys with shiny finish and rounded corners? Doesn't the Galaxy phone have a wider aspect ratio screen? How come these experts can't notice that?

htk_#1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Expert says Samsung phones, tablets infringe
htk_#1   8/7/2012 6:24:02 PM
NO RATINGS
subject matter that could be considered offensive to any race, religion, sex, ethnic group, or nationality is not proper subject matter for a Design Patent Application (35 U.S.C. 171 and 37 CFR § 1.3). The fact that I am a caucasian male and find the design of the iphone offensive proves that the iphone patent is invalid

ScooterMcGooter
User Rank
Rookie
re: Expert says Samsung phones, tablets infringe
ScooterMcGooter   8/7/2012 8:19:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Agree "when did Americans become so dumb". I was at Physio Control (Medtronic’s) and an engineer their had a patent hanging on the wall. The patent was for; "a defibrillator made portable, by putting a wall hanging hook on its back". The PTO holds my feet to the fire, but big corporate patent attorneys pay barely any more fees than the little guys. So, they can torment the PTO patent officers endlessly. I really think that some patent officers finally give in and grant these "obvious" "inventions" just to get that lawyer off their backs. Make it fairer? Easy, charge a PTO fee based on corporate valuation and gross revenue. Cut the fees in half for tiny 1 person independents. The Microshafts and Apples and Samsungs should pay a 100K application fee. They easily have the funds. If the PTO gets more income than its costs, then use the $$ to fund technical college types (Mechanical, electronics, materials) in exactly the ratios of the current applications.

Larry M
User Rank
Rookie
re: Expert says Samsung phones, tablets infringe
Larry M   8/7/2012 8:49:14 PM
NO RATINGS
The fees are already cut in half for "small entities," outfits with five or fewer employees.

David Brown
User Rank
Rookie
re: Expert says Samsung phones, tablets infringe
David Brown   8/7/2012 8:51:49 PM
NO RATINGS
If "Apple products are viewed as a sign of prestige" and "high end users prefer Apple products", then let these "high end" users buy Apple products - and let others buy other products. Apple should be happy to compete on the quality of their products, their supporting ecosystem, and the strength of their brand. If people think their "i" products are better than other devices, they will buy them. Trying to hinder competition and alternatives on the basis of being a similar shape is just pathetic. Where would the motor industry be today if early manufacturers like Benz and Daimler had sued Ford for copying their "one wheel in each corner" design?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.