Breaking News
News & Analysis

Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails

Investigating the enemy
8/9/2012 04:41 PM EDT
25 comments
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 7 Next >
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Nando Basile
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
Nando Basile   8/20/2012 9:34:51 AM
NO RATINGS
I share this point 100%. All companies serve customers. What every customer does before purchasing is comparing. Being competitive ''literally'' requires to know what competition is doing. Competitive and reverse analysis are necessary, any big company does it, this is one major task of any marketing department. To make a counter example, Nokia overlooked competition in 2009 and you see how it ended. I don't see how these sort of e-mails can seriously stand a trial about particular patent infringement.

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
Sheetal.Pandey   8/19/2012 12:53:10 PM
NO RATINGS
I guess its the competitive strategy to know your opponents strengths and weakness. After all everything is fare in war and it seems to be a big war to be at number 1 position.

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
t.alex   8/15/2012 4:35:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Is the competitor AMD :) just random guess

bmonk
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
bmonk   8/12/2012 5:08:28 PM
NO RATINGS
When I was interviewed at Intel in the 80's, one of the manager said they reversed the graphic design of fellow competitors but they could never master it.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
eewiz   8/12/2012 1:59:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Haha. This is interesting. So get an attorney to sit in the meeting to avoid discovery!

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
t.alex   8/12/2012 1:22:38 AM
NO RATINGS
Really ? Why would it be privileged if there is an attorney sitting in?

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
rick merritt   8/12/2012 12:34:41 AM
NO RATINGS
Someone told me recently some companies are having an attorney staff every major meeting so it can be considered privileged communications and exempt from discovery. Anyone else heard of such practices?

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
rick merritt   8/12/2012 12:31:52 AM
NO RATINGS
It is my understanding that in the current case the LG Prada handset is not being considered as prior art at least in part because it was not sold or marketed in the U.S. prior to the launch of the iPhone. Any patent experts here can feel free to clarify the law.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
eewiz   8/11/2012 12:50:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Yup. Infact one IP expert advised me always talk important stuff over the phone and leave no records/emails for anyone to findout.

Etmax
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
Etmax   8/11/2012 12:49:05 PM
NO RATINGS
I once worked for a major US electronics manufacturer and they had a whole department dedicated to the reverse engineering of competitor's products. They went as far as using an E-beam prober to read out the contents of protected EEPROM. They didn't copy the code, just use it for understanding benchmark results. I'm sure they weren't alone. Regarding prior art overseas, I would be very surprised if they could patent a a foreign invention overlooking foreign prior art. If they could then there would be very little stopping a foreign country from discounting any US IP rights overseas.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll