Breaking News
News & Analysis

Survey: Apple patents worth $100 per device

8/11/2012 06:00 AM EDT
13 comments
NO RATINGS
More Related Links
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
TrafficSpecialist
User Rank
Rookie
re: Survey: Apple patents worth $100 per device
TrafficSpecialist   8/15/2012 5:49:23 AM
NO RATINGS
The situation is reversed already, Samsung has stated that Apple uses many of their Apps also not to mention that Samsung manufactures almost as many parts for the Iphone and Ipad as Apple does. If Samsung were to freeze shipments of components to Apple there would be no more Iphones or Ipads for months while Apple looked for another vendor who would manufacture the Samsung patented components for them then we would have a real show. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=samsung%20components%20in%20apple&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CEYQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashgear.com%2Fapple-to-spend-11bn-on-samsung-parts-in-2012-claims-exec-13218118%2F&ei=RTgrUIm4H8e9iwKAzYHYBA&usg=AFQjCNHlwDqvXqd4YHk6dM2GrBY0FgbaWw

slc2173
User Rank
Rookie
re: Survey: Apple patents worth $100 per device
slc2173   8/14/2012 11:27:50 PM
NO RATINGS
A 3rd-party source conducted their own survey with a more comprehensive selection of features, and the relevant features that Apple contends were worth about $10 per device combined, not $100 like the Apple survey ridiculously suggests.

selinz
User Rank
CEO
re: Survey: Apple patents worth $100 per device
selinz   8/14/2012 10:43:58 PM
NO RATINGS
If we put it in terms of an app to make it do that, the only thing in my mind worth paying perhaps as much as a buck for would be the pinch/zoom and doubletap. That's cool and I first saw that on an iPhone. The bounceback stuff is not even worth a free app with advertisements. That being said, if you multiply the number of android phones times $1, I'm guessing that's a big number.

bcang
User Rank
Rookie
re: Survey: Apple patents worth $100 per device
bcang   8/14/2012 5:58:56 AM
NO RATINGS
just wonder what if the situation is reversed?

bcang
User Rank
Rookie
re: Survey: Apple patents worth $100 per device
bcang   8/14/2012 5:58:39 AM
NO RATINGS
just wonder what if the situation is reserved?

mranderson
User Rank
Rookie
re: Survey: Apple patents worth $100 per device
mranderson   8/14/2012 4:02:25 AM
NO RATINGS
This supposed survey is a joke. Nobody will pay $100 extra for some UI features that are not valid patents. In the end, I suspect the court ruling in the case between Apple and Samsung to not be favorable to either party. The government will step in for anti-trust reasons and block everything once one side decides to appeal whatever ruling comes down. The government, whether it is the US, the EU, China, or whatever, will never allow one company to control the whole cell phone industry.

abraxalito
User Rank
Rookie
re: Survey: Apple patents worth $100 per device
abraxalito   8/14/2012 1:37:41 AM
NO RATINGS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0ZZJXw4MTA

przemek
User Rank
Rookie
re: Survey: Apple patents worth $100 per device
przemek   8/13/2012 9:07:48 PM
NO RATINGS
This is nonsense--I most definitely would not pay $100 for the privilege of reverse-pinching---I maybe could spare a hundred cents, if I didn't feel revulsed by this whole situation. I think the study is self serving, and Apple should be ashamed as a technology company for playing this game. My personal take on their attitude is that they ran out of good ideas for the future, so they seek rent on competitors and ultimately end users. I support the IP rights for significant inventions, like the idea of multitouch--too bad Apple didn't invent that either, like they didn't invent the mouse or windows.

xorbit
User Rank
Rookie
re: Survey: Apple patents worth $100 per device
xorbit   8/13/2012 8:20:41 PM
NO RATINGS
I can't believe those things actually were patented. Double tap to zoom? How is that non-obvious when we're been doing double-click to zoom for ages? Bounce-back? Of course you're going to have a moving thing bounce back if you're trying to emulate real-world behavior. It's a basic physics simulation. I'm sure someone must have done it before. I am so sick of innovation being blocked at every turn by obvious stuff being patented left and right. It has to stop. Can we drop the last 10 years of patents and start over by patenting only real inventions please?

gatorfan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Survey: Apple patents worth $100 per device
gatorfan   8/13/2012 8:03:48 PM
NO RATINGS
You're seeing the difference first hand between the "white box" model that IBM used in rolling out the PC vs the "feature ecosystem" approach of Apple with smartphones and tablets. Samsung walked into the difference in models as if head first into a buzz saw. It will be interesting to see if the "feature ecosystem" is defensible. If it is, bye bye white box forever and we'll have a lot of unlearning to do. This will usher in the era of differentiated user value, and out with technical data sheet superiority.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
NIRANKUSH456
 
NIRANKUSH456
 
David Ashton
 
Rich Krajewski
 
sranje
 
MeasurementBlues
 
MeasurementBlues
 
Sanjib.A
 
David Ashton
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week