Apple attorney Bill Lee attacked Samsung’s case alleging Apple infringed five Samsung patents including two that are essential to the 3G standard set by ETSI.
Specifically, Apple alleges Samsung broke ETSI rules in failing to declare it had patents on aspects of the 3G standards. That formed the basis for Apple’s charge in the case that Samsung violated U.S. antitrust rules using its market power to unfairly claim standards-essential patents it refused to license to Apple on fair and reasonable terms.
“They have engineers who have never designed a product, whose sole job was to work with patent lawyers at standards meetings to try to get patents on standards--they were even rewarded for getting patents on standards,” Lee said.
Apple is asking for about $350,000 for the alleged antitrust violations, just enough to pay for its expert witness on the issue. “You can’t come in to this country and walk over our antitrust laws,” he said, trying to invoke a spirit of U.S. and Silicon Valley patriotism.
Lee told jurors they need to “up-end Samsung’s cynical game plan. If you render judgment for Apple you will have reaffirmed the American patent system, people here will create jobs because you will have protected the patent system,” Lee told jurors.
“This is a company that spends billion dollars a year on advertising--there are Samsung ads on Giant’s games,” said Lee. “They will not change their way of operating if you slap them on the wrist,” he said.
In a rebuttal, Verhoeven said Apple presented a distorted view of how ETSI works. In addition, he said Samsung made an offer to license its patents to Apple but Apple declined to negotiate.
The nine-person jury began its deliberations Wednesday morning.
What about providing services to the bannned Samsung phone already sold to customers? If any of those phones need to be repaired/serviced, is Samsung allowed to do that? Does this affect Samsung's customers?
Both the smartphone are good. The main fact is that apple couldn take samsung winning the battel. They say they copied S1 and sales was up. But S2 and 4 or 4S was released in the same year. S2 was preferred by most of the people even though it had few bugs. Because the cost of S2 was cheaper than iphone. Apple have just few models with them where as samsung released too many low end models. which made even budget people to buy samsung Mobiles. If apple had released similar kind of low end products damn sure samsung wouldn have had chance like this.
This is what happens if too many silly patents gets approved. Lawsuits, big fees, waste of time. After all, 10 yrs from now, no one would be using either of these fought items, everything would be obsolete.
“Every smartphone has a rectangular shape with rounded corners and 90 percent of that device is a screen—there’s nothing nefarious about this, it’s the way technology has evolved,” an iDiot would disagree with this..
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.